[Etherpad] - Error when adding comment #1445

New issue

Open

opened 2026-07-04 22:47:25 +02:00 by muppeth · 3 comments

muppeth commented

2026-07-04 22:47:25 +02:00

Owner

Trying to add a comment results in an error:

etherpad.png

45 KiB

muppeth added the

bug

🤔️ Investigate

etherpad

labels

2026-07-04 22:47:25 +02:00

meaz added this to the 2026.07 - Knock, knock... Housekeeping! project

2026-07-05 08:34:37 +02:00

meaz commented

2026-07-08 08:15:55 +02:00

Owner

@muppeth this issue is coz of CSP. If we set them back as before worked on them (check PR 357 on host_vars), we don't have the issue anymore. Should we get back to what we have before?

Also, I've seen in Firefox console quick a few number of this kind o message : GET wss://pad.disroot.org/socket.io/?padId=test&EIO=4&transport=websocket&sid=sPsdfsfdsfdsfdsf NS_ERROR_WEBSOCKET_CONNECTION_REFUSED
So I'm wondering if this could be related to Anubis blocking.

@muppeth this issue is coz of CSP. If we set them back as before worked on them (check PR 357 on host_vars), we don't have the issue anymore. Should we get back to what we have before? Also, I've seen in Firefox console quick a few number of this kind o message : `GET wss://pad.disroot.org/socket.io/?padId=test&EIO=4&transport=websocket&sid=sPsdfsfdsfdsfdsf NS_ERROR_WEBSOCKET_CONNECTION_REFUSED` So I'm wondering if this could be related to Anubis blocking.

meaz self-assigned this

2026-07-08 08:16:00 +02:00

muppeth commented

2026-07-08 09:46:27 +02:00

Author

Owner

yes on both sides I think. For now reverting the csp is good. I would say fix it in prod and make PR. I will be doing my cleanup on proxies this week (hopefully) so then I will run it. As for anubis we need to check how to do it properly to avoid websockets connection failures. My guess is we should route all non sock traffic through anubis. I will check the docs cause I guess this use case is even documented.