[SUGGESTION| LibreTranslate #507
Labels
No Label
administration
Akkoma
Android
Bare metal
bug
Communication
Community
Cryptpad
Discussion
Documentation
duplicate
enhancement
etherpad
Feature request
Feedback
finances
Fixed
forgejo
fun_project
Goal 2024
help wanted
Howto
🤔️ Investigate
ios
jitsi
lacre
Lacre Test
ldap
Lemmy
LibreTranslate
low prio
Lufi
macos
Mail
Merch
monitoring
movim
needs_refine
New Auth
Nextcloud
nice to have
on hold
proposal
question
Ready
refined
Roundcube
searX
spam-protection
Staging Server
Themes
TOR
Urgent!
Website
windows
wontfix
xmpp
Yearly Report
No Milestone
No project
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Disroot/Disroot-Project#507
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Greetings, Disrooters! XD
I recently made a post on Fedisroot and mentioned a translator I've been using called, deepl.com. @craudio, on Fedisroot, replied and mentioned LibreTranslate as being another option.
https://libretranslate.com/
I too a brief look at it and found it is a Free and Open Source Machine Translation API.
https://github.com/LibreTranslate/LibreTranslate
I feel hosting an instance of this may be of benefit to Disroot, itself, and Disrooters, alike. I, certainly, wouldn't want to suggest adding another service requiring immense time and effort to launch and maintain (like Hubzilla appears to have been), but I believe it may be worth looking into as a possible service that could be added. I, for one, would certainly incorporate it into my translation needs use.
Thank you for any consideration.
Yes we are aware of this service. Something some of of were thinking of hosting but we havent discuss it as a team yet because we are still migrating to new server setup. We are almost there though.
Thanks for suggestion,
Alright, so finally time to take a decision about this :)
I personally agree to provide this new service. It doesn't seem too complicate to deploy, and I don't see really cons about having it.
My apologies about the image removals in my post; I did some cleaning on PostImage.
I do agree too. I use it locally on my machine since some months ago and it works pretty fine. It would be a good feature to add.
@muppeth and @avg_joe what do you think?
i don't have any strong opinion either way.