Update parts to newest handwritten Skriptum
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a33f0fb12
commit
18afd12ba1
1 changed files with 55 additions and 29 deletions
84
LinAlg2.tex
84
LinAlg2.tex
|
@ -3619,11 +3619,13 @@ $ \implies q(\tilde x_1, \tilde x_2) = \lambda_1 \tilde x_1^2 + \lambda_2 \tilde
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{lemma}
|
||||
Sei $\operatorname{char}(\K) \neq 2$. Dann entsprechen die quadratischen Formen und symmetrischen
|
||||
Bilinearformen eineindeutig.
|
||||
Bilinearformen einander eineindeutig.
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
$\rho$ quadratische Form $\implies \sigma(v, w) = \rho(u + v) - \rho(u) - \rho(v)$ ist symmetrische
|
||||
Bilinearform. \\
|
||||
Sei $\sigma$ symmetrische Bilinearform, $\rho(v) := \frac 12 \sigma(v, v)$.
|
||||
Sei umgekehrt $\sigma$ symmetrische Bilinearform,
|
||||
$\rho(v) := \underset{\mathclap{\substack{\rotatebox{90}{$\to$}\\\operatorname{char}(\K) \neq 2}}}
|
||||
{\frac 12} \sigma(v, v)$.
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\rho(\lambda v) = \frac 12 \sigma(\lambda v, \lambda v) & = \lambda^2 \frac 12 \sigma(v, v) =
|
||||
\lambda^2 \rho(v) \implies \text{a)} \\
|
||||
|
@ -3639,7 +3641,7 @@ $ \implies q(\tilde x_1, \tilde x_2) = \lambda_1 \tilde x_1^2 + \lambda_2 \tilde
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{defin}
|
||||
\label{theo:3.5.6}
|
||||
$V \C$-VR. $\rho: V \to \R$ heißt \underline{hermitesche Form} wenn $\forall u, v \in V, \lambda \in \C$:
|
||||
Sei $V\, \C$-VR. $\rho: V \to \R$ heißt \underline{hermitesche Form} wenn $\forall u, v \in V, \lambda \in \C$:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label=\alph*)]
|
||||
\item $\rho(\lambda v) = \abs{\lambda}^2 \rho(v)$
|
||||
\item $\rho(u+v) + \rho(u -v) = 2(\rho(u) + \rho(v))$
|
||||
|
@ -3686,17 +3688,20 @@ $\sigma$ heißt Polarform von $\rho$
|
|||
|
||||
\section[Die Singulärwertzerlegung und die Pseudoinverse]{Die Singulärwertzerlegung und die \\Pseudoinverse}
|
||||
|
||||
Wollen Normalform für $\alpha \in \homk(V, W)$ mit $V, W$ euklidisch/unitär herleiten.
|
||||
Polarzerlegung: $W = V \implies \exists$ ONBs $B, B'$ von $V$ mit
|
||||
Wir wollen nun für zwei euklidische Vektorräume $V, W$ eine geeignete Normalform bezüglich Orthonormalbasen
|
||||
herleiten. Polarzerlegung besagt für $\alpha \in \Hom(V, V)$, dass Orthonormalbasen $B, B'$ von $V$ existieren
|
||||
mit
|
||||
\[
|
||||
{}_B M(\alpha)_B = \begin{pmatrix}s_1 \\
|
||||
{}_B M(\alpha)_B = \begin{pmatrix}
|
||||
s_1 \\
|
||||
& \ddots \\
|
||||
& & s_r \\
|
||||
& & & 0 \\
|
||||
& & & & \ddots \\
|
||||
& & & & & 0\end{pmatrix}, s_1, \dots, s_n > 0
|
||||
& & & & & 0
|
||||
\end{pmatrix}, s_1, \dots, s_n > 0
|
||||
\]
|
||||
Das gilt für $V, W$ allgemein.
|
||||
Das heißt $\alpha$ lässt sich aus orthogonalen Endomorphismen und Skalierung zusammensetzen.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{satz}[Singulärwertzerlegung]
|
||||
Sei $A \in \R^{m \times n} / \C^{m \times n}$. Dann gibt es orthogonale/unitäre Matrizen $U, V$ sowie
|
||||
|
@ -3707,21 +3712,23 @@ Das gilt für $V, W$ allgemein.
|
|||
& & s_r \\
|
||||
& & & 0 \\
|
||||
& & & & \ddots \\
|
||||
& & & & & 0\end{pmatrix}}_{\K^{m \times m}} \underbrace{V}_{\K^{m \times n}}
|
||||
& & & & & 0\end{pmatrix}}_{\K^{m \times n}} \underbrace{V}_{\K^{n \times n}}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
$s_1, \dots, s_r$ heißen positive \underline{Singulärwerte} von $A$.
|
||||
$s_1, \dots, s_r$ heißen \underline{Singulärwerte} von $A$.
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item $A^* A \in \K^{\nxn}$ selbstadjungiert und positiv semi-definit.
|
||||
Eigenwerte $\lambda_1, \dots, \lambda_n \in [0, \infty)$, ONB $b_1, \dots, b_n$ aus Eigenvektoren.
|
||||
Sei $\lambda_1, \dots, \lambda_r \in (0, \infty), \lambda_{r+1} = \dots = \lambda_n = 0$
|
||||
$s_i := \sqrt{\lambda_i}, i\in [n]$
|
||||
\item $\overbrace{\frac 1{s_1} A b_1}^{b_1'}, \dots, \overbrace{\frac 1{s_r} A b_r}^{b_r'}$ ist
|
||||
Orthonormalsystem in $\K^m$.
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\overline{\inner{Ab_i}{Ab_j}}_{\K^m} = \overline{b_i}^T A^* A b_j = \lambda_j \overline{b_i}^T b_j
|
||||
= \lambda_j \overline{\inner{b_i}{b_j}}_{\K^n} = \lambda_j \delta_{ij} \in \R
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\item Es gilt, dass $\overbrace{\frac 1{s_1} A b_1}^{b_1'}, \dots, \overbrace{\frac 1{s_r} A b_r}^{b_r'}$
|
||||
Orthonormalsystem in $\K^m$ ist.
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\overline{\inner{Ab_i}{Ab_j}}_{\K^m} & = \overline{b_i^T A^T \overline A \,\overline{b_j}}
|
||||
= \overline{b_i}^T A^* A b_j = \lambda_j \overline{b_i}^T b_j \\
|
||||
& = \lambda_j \overline{\inner{b_i}{b_j}}_{\K^n}
|
||||
= \lambda_j \delta_{ij} \in \R
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
\item Ergänze $b_1', \dots, b_r'$ zu Orthonormalbasis $b_1', \dots, b_r', \dots, b_m'$ von $\K^m$. \\
|
||||
Sei $\varphi_A: x \mapsto A\cdot x \implies {}_{B'} M(\varphi_A)_B = \left( \begin{smallmatrix}
|
||||
s_1 \\
|
||||
|
@ -3736,23 +3743,42 @@ Das gilt für $V, W$ allgemein.
|
|||
\end{proof}
|
||||
\end{satz}
|
||||
|
||||
Mittels der Singulärwertzerlegung können wir für jede Matrix (bzw. lineare Abbildung) eine verallgemeinerte
|
||||
Inverse berechnen.
|
||||
|
||||
Sei ${}_B M(\alpha)_B = \begin{pmatrix}s_1 \\
|
||||
& \ddots \\
|
||||
& & s_r \\
|
||||
& & & 0 \\
|
||||
& & & & \ddots \\
|
||||
& & & & & 0\end{pmatrix}$ \\
|
||||
$\implies \ker(\alpha) = \langle b_{r+1}, \dots, b_n \rangle_V, \im(\alpha) = \langle b'_1, \dots b_r' \rangle_W,
|
||||
\ker(\alpha)^\bot = \langle b_1, \dots, b_r \rangle_V$
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\alpha: & V \to
|
||||
& & \ker(\alpha)^{\bot} \overset{\beta}{\to}
|
||||
& & \im(\alpha) \to
|
||||
& & W \\
|
||||
& \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i b_i \mapsto
|
||||
& & \sum_{i=1}^r \lambda_i b_i \mapsto
|
||||
& & \sum_{i=1}^r s_i \lambda_i b_i' \mapsto
|
||||
& & \sum_{i=1}^r s_i \lambda_i b_i' \\
|
||||
& \sum_{i=1}^r \frac{\mu_i}{s_i} b_i \mapsfrom
|
||||
& & \sum_{i=1}^r \frac{1}{s_i} \mu_i b_i \underset{\beta^{-1}}{\mapsfrom}
|
||||
& & \sum_{i=1}^r \mu_i b_i' \mapsfrom
|
||||
& & \sum_{i=1}^m \mu_i b_i' = w \cdot \alpha^{+}
|
||||
\alpha: V & \to
|
||||
\ker(\alpha)^{\bot} & & \overset{\beta}{\to}
|
||||
\im(\alpha) & & \to
|
||||
W \\
|
||||
\sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i b_i & \mapsto
|
||||
\sum_{i=1}^r \lambda_i b_i & & \mapsto
|
||||
\sum_{i=1}^r s_i \lambda_i b_i' & & \mapsto
|
||||
\sum_{i=1}^r s_i \lambda_i b_i' \\
|
||||
\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x_1 \\ \vdots \\ x_n\end{smallmatrix}\right) & \mapsto
|
||||
\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x_1 \\ \vdots \\ x_r\end{smallmatrix}\right) & & \mapsto
|
||||
\left(\begin{smallmatrix}s_1 x_1 \\ \vdots \\ s_r x_r\end{smallmatrix}\right) & & \mapsto
|
||||
\left.\left(\begin{smallmatrix}
|
||||
s_1 x_1 \\ \vdots \\ s_r x_r \\ 0 \\ \vdots \\ 0
|
||||
\end{smallmatrix}\right)\right\} m \\
|
||||
\sum_{i=1}^r \frac{\mu_i}{s_i} b_i & \mapsfrom
|
||||
\sum_{i=1}^r \frac{1}{s_i} \mu_i b_i & & \underset{\beta^{-1}}{\mapsfrom}
|
||||
\sum_{i=1}^r \mu_i b_i' & & \mapsfrom
|
||||
\sum_{i=1}^m \mu_i b_i' = w \cdot \alpha^{+}
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Bemerkung:}
|
||||
$\alpha$ invertierbar, $V=W \implies n = m = r \implies \alpha^+ = \alpha^{-1}$
|
||||
$\alpha$ invertierbar, $V=W \implies n = m = r \implies \alpha^+ = \alpha^{-1}$ \\
|
||||
Wir haben eine echte Verallgemeinerung.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{defin}
|
||||
\leavevmode
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue