4 changed files with 285 additions and 236 deletions
@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
|
||||
# liberethos_paradigm |
||||
|
||||
Information and tools to facilitate ethical consumption of goods and services. |
||||
Our mission: supply information and tools to facilitate ethical consumption of goods and services. |
||||
|
||||
The following catalogs include blacklists, whitelists, and graylists of financial institutions: |
||||
|
||||
* [banks in the US](usa_banks.md) |
||||
* [brokerages in the US](usa_brokerages.md) |
||||
* [insurance companies in the US](usa_insurance_companies.md) |
||||
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
|
||||
# Why ALEC members are blacklisted |
||||
|
||||
American Legislative Exchange Council ("ALEC") is a right-wing super PAC and bill mill that puts corporate interests above the interest of human beings. ALEC: |
||||
|
||||
* [fights environmental protections](https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Environment,_Energy,_and_Agriculture) |
||||
* [fights gun control](https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Guns,_Prisons,_Crime,_and_Immigration) |
||||
* [fights healthcare](https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Health,_Pharmaceuticals,_and_Safety_Net_Programs) |
||||
* [fights immigration](https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Guns,_Prisons,_Crime,_and_Immigration) |
||||
* [fights worker's rights](https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Worker_Rights_and_Consumer_Rights) |
||||
* [fights consumer protections](https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Worker_Rights_and_Consumer_Rights) |
||||
* [fights public education](https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Privatizing_Public_Education,_Higher_Ed_Policy,_and_Teachers) |
||||
* fights women's rights |
||||
* fights voter rights ([supports voter suppression policy](https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Democracy,_Voter_Rights,_and_Federal_Power)) |
||||
* [finances republicans](https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ALEC_Civil_Justice_Task_Force#Politicians) |
||||
* supports the NRA |
||||
|
||||
Countless companies were ALEC members historically, but most of them discontinued membership and renounced it likely to avoid boycott. |
||||
Companies that continue to renew their ALEC membership are right-wing die-hards unlikely to join team humanity. So they are blacklisted. |
||||
|
||||
The OK hand sign (👌) indicates that the financial institution still today supports the above-mentioned right-wing agenda through ALEC membership. |
||||
|
||||
# Why Tor-hostile FIs are blacklisted |
||||
|
||||
Financial institutions that are aggressively Tor-hostile are automatically blacklisted. |
||||
|
||||
<details> |
||||
<summary>Why access to banks, brokerages, and insurance companies over Tor matters</summary> |
||||
If Tor were used exclusively for anonymity, it would be useless in the |
||||
context of consumers accessing and controlling their financial |
||||
accounts. But that's not the case. Tor prevents your ISP from |
||||
snooping on where you bank. ISPs collect data on their own customers |
||||
and exploit it for profit in the US. Under Obama it became illegal |
||||
for an ISP to sell data collected on their customers without express |
||||
consent. As if that's not already useless thanks to an abundant supply |
||||
of consumers who will agree to anything without reading it, Trump |
||||
<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-signs-measure-let-isps-sell-your-data-without-consent-n742316">reversed</a> |
||||
Obama's policy in 2017 to render consumers completely powerless. Tor |
||||
is a free tool to protect from excessive disclosure of where your |
||||
assets are. Thus when a financial institution blocks Tor, it prevents you |
||||
from taking basic self-defense measures. This trend undermines the |
||||
supplier-client relationship whereby we expect the supplier to serve |
||||
the customer's interest. It's not just anti-privacy, it's |
||||
anti-consumer. |
||||
|
||||
Non-Tor users generally reveal their physical location to their bank or insurance company |
||||
every time they login. If all banks and insurance companies didn't care where you reside, |
||||
this wouldn't be a problem. But some financial institutions care more than others and |
||||
beyond reason. Banks typically |
||||
[collect your IP address](https://web.archive.org/web/20201024203113/www.decorahbank.com/legal-information/privacy-policy) |
||||
and one bank even outright admits in their |
||||
[privacy policy](https://web.archive.org/web/20210206141004/https://beneficialstatebank.com/uploads/files/BSB-Consumer-Privacy-Act-CCPA-Privacy-Notice-Current-6.4.2020.pdf#page=2) |
||||
that they collect geolocation data from customers' IP addresses. For |
||||
nomads/world travelers banks can make their lives hell if their |
||||
profile doesn't seem to match up with their lifestyle. Some banks |
||||
will close an account if a customer moves out of their service area. |
||||
Insurance companies will question whether you're still eligible for |
||||
the policy you have, as they may want to raise your premiums or cancel |
||||
your policy if they suspect you're not where your policy is written. |
||||
If you want to take a job away from home for a year or two, Tor gives |
||||
you the necessary privacy to do that free of hassle and nannying. |
||||
</details> |
||||
|
||||
<details> |
||||
<summary>Why non-Tor users should also boycott Tor adversaries</summary> |
||||
Suppose you never leave home, and you're not bothered if your ISP |
||||
collects data on where you bank to then sell to data brokers who can |
||||
then sell it to debt collectors. If you're ethical nonetheless, then |
||||
you still boycott those who marginalize Tor users. These quotes |
||||
elaborate on that moral duty: |
||||
|
||||
"*If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the |
||||
side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a |
||||
mouse, and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate |
||||
your neutrality.*" --Desmond Tutu |
||||
|
||||
"*Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you |
||||
have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about |
||||
free speech because you have nothing to say.*" --Edward Snowden |
||||
|
||||
To expand on Snowden's philosophy, it's extremely selfish to refuse to |
||||
defend a right that others need on the basis that you don't personally |
||||
need it now or in the future. Moreover, indirect benefits should not |
||||
be overlooked. Human rights activists need civil liberties more than |
||||
others, but we all need activists to make the world better for |
||||
everyone. Moral duties to you derive from that. |
||||
|
||||
Tor is becoming less usable because the growing majority non-Tor users |
||||
are patronizing businesses that marginalize Tor users. |
||||
|
||||
"*Under observation, we act less free, which means we effectively are |
||||
less free.*" --Edward Snowden |
||||
|
||||
To neglect to use Tor is to subject yourself to unnecessary |
||||
observation. In the context of banking and finance, this in turn |
||||
reduces your freedom of movement. |
||||
</details> |
||||
|
||||
The eye (👁) indicates that account access is restricted and exclusive to non-Tor users, |
||||
who must expose their IP address to the FI and who must expose their FI to their ISP. |
||||
|
||||
# Why FIs in CloudFlare's walled-garden are blacklisted |
||||
|
||||
Financial institutions that proxy their services through CloudFlare are |
||||
blacklisted automatically for taking a profoundly stupid risk with |
||||
consumer's sensitive financial data. CloudFlare holds the SSL keys |
||||
for every connection and sees all the traffic including username and |
||||
unhashed password. CloudFlare has proven to be untrustworthy with |
||||
sensitive information (demonstrated by CloudFlare's doxxing of the |
||||
identities of child porn whistle blowers). Apart from the |
||||
unacceptably high security risk of having a CloudFlare MitM, there are |
||||
countless [ethical problems](rap_sheets/cloudflare.md) with being an |
||||
enabler of CloudFlare. |
||||
|
||||
The storm cloud (🌩) indicates that account access is restricted and exclusive per CloudFlare's will and customers who do get access are forced to share sensitive transaction data with CloudFlare, Inc. (a privacy abuser). |
||||
|
||||
# Why CISPA supporters are graylisted |
||||
|
||||
The [Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_Intelligence_Sharing_and_Protection_Act) |
||||
was a bill to bypass the 4^(th) amendment to promote a system of unwarranted |
||||
mass surveillance through information sharing between the government and private sector. |
||||
Congress blocked the bill, but it was later reincarnated as CISA and it passed. |
||||
Unlike ALEC lobbying, CISPA was a one-off event far in the past, and over 800 companies supported it. |
||||
Since it does not necessarily reflect the company's recent stance or influence, |
||||
supporters are graylisted instead of blacklisted. They should still be avoided in |
||||
favor of a whitelisted competitor, but they are considerably less evil than those that are blacklisted. |
||||
|
||||
The spook (🕵) indicates that the financial institution lobbied for a police surveillance state in favor of CISPA. |
||||
|
||||
# Why FIs that force their staff to take a drug test are graylisted |
||||
|
||||
Drug testing employees is an assault on the privacy and lifestyle of employees and staff outside the workplace. |
||||
In most cases involving medicinal marijuana states, the drug test also harms the healthcare of employees by |
||||
intervening in doctors' prescriptions. Normally drug testing would justify blacklisting, but the problem is so |
||||
widespread nationwide that the whitelist tends to be overly small. Drug testing also does not do significant |
||||
harm to consumers, so companies that drug test are graylisted. |
||||
|
||||
The test tube (🧪) indicates that the financial institution abuses their staff through forced drug testing. |
||||
|
||||
# Why Amazon and Google-hosted FIs are graylisted |
||||
|
||||
Amazon is behind [countless evils](rap_sheets/amazon.md). It's paramount to boycott |
||||
Amazon for anyone who cares about human rights, privacy, or the |
||||
environment. Amazon also has had several data breaches-- Capital One, |
||||
Juspay, Swiggy, etc., so it's a bad idea to trust custodians who use |
||||
AWS with the security of your money. Google is also evil. Not the degree of evil |
||||
that Amazon has achieved, but Google is in the fossil fuel business among |
||||
other evils. Google is also a central tech giant which (like Amazon) serves |
||||
as a central point of surveillance and also carries the risks of having |
||||
a huge number of insiders who can abuse the data. The size of the Amazon and Google |
||||
datacenters also makes them a likely target for outside hackers due to the high |
||||
rewards of compromise. |
||||
|
||||
Akamai is not known to have a significant history of wrongdoing on the scale of Amazon or Google. |
||||
There is cause for concern in terms of security though because it's large enough to serve as a |
||||
central monitoring point where breaches and compromise is still considerable. |
||||
Akamai-hosted financial institutions are not graylisted for that reason alone. |
||||
In the end, you're the judge. |
||||
|
||||
Financial institutions hosted on GAFAM (Google Amazon Facebook Apple Microsoft) are graylisted. |
||||
The wrongdoing is indirect and in the end taking a security risk doesn't necessarily lead to a breach. |
||||
Of course it's still ethically favorable to choose a whitelisted financial institution if possible. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue