added 3 challs

WolfSecCon2022/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Will probably refine the writeups even more later on

WolfSecCon2022/RSAwithTheDogs/writeup.md

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+# RSA with the dogs
+
+`e` is very large so wiener attack is possible
+
+```sh
+./RsaCtfTool.py -n 80958280137410344469270793621735550547403923964041971008952114628165974409360380289792220885326992426579868790128162893145613324338067958789899179419581085862309223717281585829617191377490590947730109453817502130283318153315193437990052156404947863059961976057429879645314342452813233368655425822274689461707 -e 3575901247532182907389411227211529824636724376722157756567776602226084740339294992167070515627141715229879280406393029563498781044157896403506408797685517148091205601955885898295742740813509895317351882951244059944509598074900130252149053360447229439583686319853300112906033979011695531155686173063061146739 --uncipher 80629080505342932586166479028264765764709326746119909040860609021743893395577080637958779561184335633322859567681317501709922573784403504695809067898870536224427948000498261469984511352960143456934810825186736399371084350678586129000118485271831798923746976704036847707653422361120164687989605124465224952493 --attack wiener
+```

WolfSecCon2022/anything/writeup.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# ANYTHING
+
+Were given the encrypted flag `wfa{oporteec_gvb_ogd}`.
+
+Since this is all printable text and the curly braces are not encrypted we can deduce that this is probably some classical cipher.
+
+Sice the flag format is `wsc{}` we can see that this is not doing the same operation on every letter (if it were then the `w` in the ciphertext would be something else).
+
+The next obvious guess would be to try viginere, and using the hint `this could be encrypted with ANYTHING` we can try using that as our key. And we get the flag `wsc{vigenere_not_bad}`
+
+Or we could just throw it into the boxentriq cipher analyzer and we would see that this is viginere and follow the same procedure ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯

WolfSecCon2022/johnsonbank/writeup.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# Johnsons bank
+
+This ones just a simple timing attack
+
+From the note in the login screen we can see that the username is probably his name and we find that `williamjohnson` works.
+
+From the provided source we can deduce that this is probably a timing attack
+```
+// The authentication code is written in JohnsonScript, a much, much slower version of JavaScript
+```
+```javascript
+function checkPassword(userInput, correctPassword){
+    return userInput === correctPassword;
+}
+```
+
+Our team used some burp extension to do the timing attack