kpriv/freebsd-ports
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
freebsd-ports/devel/p5-Test-Benchmark/Makefile

26 lines
574 B
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

Sometimes you want to make sure that your "faster" algorithm really is faster than the old way. This lets you check. It might also be useful to check that your super whizzo XS or Inline::C version is actually faster. This module is based on the standard Benchmark module. If you have lots of timings to compare and you don't want to keep running the same benchmarks all the time, you can pass in a result object from Benchmark::timethis() instead of sub routine reference. Author: Fergal Daly <fergal@esatclear.ie> WWW: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Benchmark/ PR: ports/100218 Submitted by: Gea-Suan Lin <gslin at gslin.org>
2006-07-14 18:02:40 +02:00
# New ports collection makefile for: p5-Test-Benchmark
# Date created: 2006-07-13
# Whom: Gea-Suan Lin <gslin@gslin.org>
#
# $FreeBSD$
#
PORTNAME= Test-Benchmark
PORTVERSION= 0.004
CATEGORIES= devel perl5
- Take advantage of CPAN macro from bsd.sites.mk, change ${MASTER_SITE_PERL_CPAN} to CPAN. PR: ports/122674 Submitted by: Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Reworked by: araujo (myself) Approved by: portmgr (pav)
2008-04-17 16:30:31 +02:00
MASTER_SITES= CPAN
Sometimes you want to make sure that your "faster" algorithm really is faster than the old way. This lets you check. It might also be useful to check that your super whizzo XS or Inline::C version is actually faster. This module is based on the standard Benchmark module. If you have lots of timings to compare and you don't want to keep running the same benchmarks all the time, you can pass in a result object from Benchmark::timethis() instead of sub routine reference. Author: Fergal Daly <fergal@esatclear.ie> WWW: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Benchmark/ PR: ports/100218 Submitted by: Gea-Suan Lin <gslin at gslin.org>
2006-07-14 18:02:40 +02:00
PKGNAMEPREFIX= p5-
MAINTAINER= gslin@gslin.org
COMMENT= Make sure something really is faster
BUILD_DEPENDS= ${SITE_PERL}/Test/Tester.pm:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Test-Tester \
${SITE_PERL}/Test/NoWarnings.pm:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Test-NoWarnings
At the moment 1385 ports use BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS} and 450 ports use BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS}. This patch fixes ports that are currently broken. This is a temporary measure until we organically stop using := or someone(s) spend a lot of time changing all the ports over. Explicit duplication > := > = and this just moves ports one step to the left Approved by: portmgr
2012-01-21 18:40:15 +01:00
RUN_DEPENDS:= ${BUILD_DEPENDS}
Sometimes you want to make sure that your "faster" algorithm really is faster than the old way. This lets you check. It might also be useful to check that your super whizzo XS or Inline::C version is actually faster. This module is based on the standard Benchmark module. If you have lots of timings to compare and you don't want to keep running the same benchmarks all the time, you can pass in a result object from Benchmark::timethis() instead of sub routine reference. Author: Fergal Daly <fergal@esatclear.ie> WWW: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Benchmark/ PR: ports/100218 Submitted by: Gea-Suan Lin <gslin at gslin.org>
2006-07-14 18:02:40 +02:00
PERL_CONFIGURE= yes
MAN3= Test::Benchmark.3
- lang/perl5.6 is dead, remove PERL_LEVEL/PERL_VERSION < 500801 checks PR: ports/135398 Tested by: 2 -exp runs by pav Approved by: portmgr (pav)
2009-07-22 18:27:08 +02:00
.include <bsd.port.mk>
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink