freebsd-ports/benchmarks/unixbench/Makefile

# New ports collection makefile for:    bytebench
# Date created:         28 December 1995
# Whom:                 se
#
# $FreeBSD$
#

PORTNAME=	bytebench
PORTVERSION=	3.1
CATEGORIES=	benchmarks
MASTER_SITES=	ftp://ftp.inria.fr/archives/system/benchmark/
EXTRACT_SUFX=	.tar.Z

MAINTAINER=	se@FreeBSD.org
COMMENT=	The BYTE magazine benchmark suite

do-install:
	-${MKDIR} $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench
	for f in Makefile README Run doc pgms results testdir; \
		do ${CP} -R $(WRKSRC)/$$f $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench; done
	${ECHO_CMD} "#!/bin/sh"		   >  $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
	${ECHO_CMD} "TMPDIR=\$${TMPDIR-/var/tmp}" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
	${ECHO_CMD} "RESULTDIR=/tmp"		   >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
	${ECHO_CMD} "export TMPDIR RESULTDIR"	   >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
	${ECHO_CMD} "cd $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench"  >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
	${ECHO_CMD} "exec ./Run \"\$$@\""	   >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
	${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
	${CHMOD} 644 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/Makefile
	${CHMOD} 644 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/README
	${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/Run
	${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/doc
	${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/pgms
	${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/pgms/*
	${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/results
	${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/testdir
	@${RM} -f ${PREFIX}/lib/bytebench/pgms/*.orig

.include <bsd.port.mk>
Add "do-install" target. 1996-01-03 00:08:59 +01:00			`# New ports collection makefile for: bytebench`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 23:57:36 +01:00			`# Date created: 28 December 1995`
			`# Whom: se`
			`#`
Change Id->FreeBSD. 1999-08-25 06:58:03 +02:00			`# $FreeBSD$`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 23:57:36 +01:00			`#`

update with the new PORTNAME/PORTVERSION variables 2000-04-09 00:04:57 +02:00			`PORTNAME= bytebench`
			`PORTVERSION= 3.1`
Use MAN? macros. CATEGORIES+= -> CATEGORIES. 1996-11-18 12:44:27 +01:00			`CATEGORIES= benchmarks`
File moved on master site. 2003-06-17 22:54:34 +02:00			`MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.inria.fr/archives/system/benchmark/`
Use MAN? macros. CATEGORIES+= -> CATEGORIES. 1996-11-18 12:44:27 +01:00			`EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.Z`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 23:57:36 +01:00
			`MAINTAINER= se@FreeBSD.org`
Clear moonlight beckons. Requiem mors pacem pkg-comment, And be calm ports tree. E Nomini Patri, E Fili, E Spiritu Sancti. 2003-03-07 07:14:21 +01:00			`COMMENT= The BYTE magazine benchmark suite`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 23:57:36 +01:00
Add "do-install" target. 1996-01-03 00:08:59 +01:00			`do-install:`
Fix some portlint problems. echo -> ${ECHO}, fill in version required and shorten DESCR. 1999-07-18 08:02:56 +02:00			`-${MKDIR} $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench`
			`for f in Makefile README Run doc pgms results testdir; \`
			`do ${CP} -R $(WRKSRC)/$$f $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench; done`
Use ${ECHO_CMD} instead of ${ECHO} where you mean the echo command; the ECHO macro is set to "echo" by default, but it is set to "true" if make(1) is invoked with the -s option while ECHO_CMD is always set to the echo command. Use command macros where appropriate. 2002-01-29 10:39:59 +01:00			`${ECHO_CMD} "#!/bin/sh" > $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`${ECHO_CMD} "TMPDIR=\$${TMPDIR-/var/tmp}" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`${ECHO_CMD} "RESULTDIR=/tmp" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`${ECHO_CMD} "export TMPDIR RESULTDIR" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`${ECHO_CMD} "cd $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`${ECHO_CMD} "exec ./Run \"\$$@\"" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
chmod -> ${CHMOD} chown -> ${CHOWN} 1999-08-22 21:01:07 +02:00			`${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
chmod -> ${CHMOD} 1999-08-22 23:16:33 +02:00			`${CHMOD} 644 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/Makefile`
			`${CHMOD} 644 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/README`
			`${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/Run`
			`${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/doc`
			`${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/pgms`
			`${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/pgms/*`
			`${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/results`
			`${CHMOD} 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/testdir`
expr -> ${EXPR} mv -> ${MV} rm -> ${RM} tr -> ${TR} 1999-08-28 04:42:41 +02:00			`@${RM} -f ${PREFIX}/lib/bytebench/pgms/*.orig`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 23:57:36 +01:00
			`.include <bsd.port.mk>`