devel/llvm14: arm and aarch64 improvements

Change clang to allow -m32 on arm64.  This is a backport from upstream
and will be merged to FreeBSD head soon.  See D40943 for more info.

Remove an obsolete patch which breaks arm64. [0]

When BE_NATIVE is specified on aarch64, include the ARM (32-bit)
backend.

PR:		271616 [0]
Reported by:	jfc@mit.edu [0]
This commit is contained in:
Brooks Davis 2023-07-12 19:19:10 +01:00
parent c4e3653e71
commit 3dcb15dfa4
3 changed files with 34 additions and 95 deletions

View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
PORTNAME= llvm
DISTVERSION= 14.0.6
PORTREVISION= 0
PORTREVISION= 1
CATEGORIES= devel lang
MASTER_SITES= https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/download/llvmorg-${DISTVERSION:S/rc/-rc/}/ \
https://${PRE_}releases.llvm.org/${LLVM_RELEASE}/${RCDIR}
@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ FREEBSD_BACKENDS= ${_FREEBSD_BACKENDS}
.if ${ARCH} == amd64
_NATIVE_BACKENDS= X86
.elif ${ARCH} == aarch64
_NATIVE_BACKENDS= AArch64
_NATIVE_BACKENDS= AArch64 ARM
.elif ${ARCH:Marmv*}
_NATIVE_BACKENDS= ARM
.elif ${ARCH} == i386

View file

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
commit 3450272fc281979388bb845a9fffb59b42cc2e7e
Author: Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
Date: Mon Jul 10 01:40:58 2023 +0100
[Driver][FreeBSD] Generalise lib32 handling to support arm
The current code maintains its own list of 32-bit architectures for
which there is a 64-bit FreeBSD architecture that supports it for lib32.
This is unnecessary (if it's not supported, the directory just won't
exist), and means that, when FreeBSD gains lib32 support for a new
architecture, you need an updated toolchain that knows about it.
Instead we can check for any 32-bit architecture and have forwards
compatibility.
This is motivated by FreeBSD adding support for building arm lib32
libraries on aarch64.
Co-authored-by: Mike Karels <karels@FreeBSD.org>
diff --git clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/FreeBSD.cpp clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/FreeBSD.cpp
--- clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/FreeBSD.cpp.orig 2022-06-22 17:46:24.000000000 +0100
+++ clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/FreeBSD.cpp 2023-07-12 18:38:47.053029000 +0100
@@ -385,8 +385,7 @@
// When targeting 32-bit platforms, look for '/usr/lib32/crt1.o' and fall
// back to '/usr/lib' if it doesn't exist.
- if ((Triple.getArch() == llvm::Triple::x86 || Triple.isMIPS32() ||
- Triple.isPPC32()) &&
+ if (Triple.isArch32Bit() &&
D.getVFS().exists(getDriver().SysRoot + "/usr/lib32/crt1.o"))
getFilePaths().push_back(getDriver().SysRoot + "/usr/lib32");
else

View file

@ -1,93 +0,0 @@
commit 24b1a5b926832f68fa0a008b2484d4b44f58ee8e
Author: dim <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat Sep 14 10:55:33 2019 +0000
Revert commit from upstream llvm trunk (by Hans Wennborg):
Re-commit r357452 (take 3): "SimplifyCFG
SinkCommonCodeFromPredecessors: Also sink function calls without used
results (PR41259)"
Third time's the charm.
This was reverted in r363220 due to being suspected of an internal
benchmark regression and a test failure, none of which turned out to
be caused by this.
As reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43269, this causes
UNREACHABLE errors when compiling if_malo_pci.c for arm and aarch64.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang900-import/; revision=352318
diff --git lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
index 11651d040dc0..6e2ef67408d9 100644
--- llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
@@ -1428,10 +1428,9 @@ static bool HoistThenElseCodeToIf(BranchInst *BI,
static bool canSinkInstructions(
ArrayRef<Instruction *> Insts,
DenseMap<Instruction *, SmallVector<Value *, 4>> &PHIOperands) {
- // Prune out obviously bad instructions to move. Each instruction must have
- // exactly zero or one use, and we check later that use is by a single, common
- // PHI instruction in the successor.
- bool HasUse = !Insts.front()->user_empty();
+ // Prune out obviously bad instructions to move. Any non-store instruction
+ // must have exactly one use, and we check later that use is by a single,
+ // common PHI instruction in the successor.
for (auto *I : Insts) {
// These instructions may change or break semantics if moved.
if (isa<PHINode>(I) || I->isEHPad() || isa<AllocaInst>(I) ||
@@ -1445,10 +1444,9 @@ static bool canSinkInstructions(
if (C->isInlineAsm())
return false;
- // Each instruction must have zero or one use.
- if (HasUse && !I->hasOneUse())
- return false;
- if (!HasUse && !I->user_empty())
+ // Everything must have only one use too, apart from stores which
+ // have no uses.
+ if (!isa<StoreInst>(I) && !I->hasOneUse())
return false;
}
@@ -1457,11 +1455,11 @@ static bool canSinkInstructions(
if (!I->isSameOperationAs(I0))
return false;
- // All instructions in Insts are known to be the same opcode. If they have a
- // use, check that the only user is a PHI or in the same block as the
- // instruction, because if a user is in the same block as an instruction we're
- // contemplating sinking, it must already be determined to be sinkable.
- if (HasUse) {
+ // All instructions in Insts are known to be the same opcode. If they aren't
+ // stores, check the only user of each is a PHI or in the same block as the
+ // instruction, because if a user is in the same block as an instruction
+ // we're contemplating sinking, it must already be determined to be sinkable.
+ if (!isa<StoreInst>(I0)) {
auto *PNUse = dyn_cast<PHINode>(*I0->user_begin());
auto *Succ = I0->getParent()->getTerminator()->getSuccessor(0);
if (!all_of(Insts, [&PNUse,&Succ](const Instruction *I) -> bool {
@@ -1539,7 +1537,7 @@ static bool sinkLastInstruction(ArrayRef<BasicBlock*> Blocks) {
// it is slightly over-aggressive - it gets confused by commutative instructions
// so double-check it here.
Instruction *I0 = Insts.front();
- if (!I0->user_empty()) {
+ if (!isa<StoreInst>(I0)) {
auto *PNUse = dyn_cast<PHINode>(*I0->user_begin());
if (!all_of(Insts, [&PNUse](const Instruction *I) -> bool {
auto *U = cast<Instruction>(*I->user_begin());
@@ -1597,10 +1595,11 @@ static bool sinkLastInstruction(ArrayRef<BasicBlock*> Blocks) {
I0->andIRFlags(I);
}
- if (!I0->user_empty()) {
+ if (!isa<StoreInst>(I0)) {
// canSinkLastInstruction checked that all instructions were used by
// one and only one PHI node. Find that now, RAUW it to our common
// instruction and nuke it.
+ assert(I0->hasOneUse());
auto *PN = cast<PHINode>(*I0->user_begin());
PN->replaceAllUsesWith(I0);
PN->eraseFromParent();