From ecb497e8c135dd8c99aced6861512f6956a98578 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernard Spil Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:45:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] security/openssl-quictls: Security update to 3.0.9 PR: 271779 MFH: 2023Q2 Security: eb9a3c57-ff9e-11ed-a0d1-84a93843eb75 --- security/openssl-quictls/Makefile | 5 +- security/openssl-quictls/distinfo | 6 +- .../openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 | 293 ------------------ .../openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 | 126 -------- .../openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 | 91 ------ 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 516 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 delete mode 100644 security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 delete mode 100644 security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 diff --git a/security/openssl-quictls/Makefile b/security/openssl-quictls/Makefile index 56153c991ced..db2c931049b1 100644 --- a/security/openssl-quictls/Makefile +++ b/security/openssl-quictls/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ PORTNAME= openssl -PORTVERSION= 3.0.8 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTVERSION= 3.0.9 CATEGORIES= security devel PKGNAMESUFFIX= -quictls @@ -25,7 +24,7 @@ USES= cpe perl5 USE_PERL5= build USE_GITHUB= yes GH_ACCOUNT= ${PKGNAMESUFFIX:S/-//} -GH_TAGNAME= 183e548d93a6aeedab0fd6cb737923a93f807b83 +GH_TAGNAME= d2cc208d34cfe2b56d4ef8bcd8e3983a4d00d6bd TEST_TARGET= test diff --git a/security/openssl-quictls/distinfo b/security/openssl-quictls/distinfo index 05ef32ed72ff..253ceea268cc 100644 --- a/security/openssl-quictls/distinfo +++ b/security/openssl-quictls/distinfo @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -TIMESTAMP = 1675800208 -SHA256 (quictls-openssl-3.0.8-183e548d93a6aeedab0fd6cb737923a93f807b83_GH0.tar.gz) = dcba83c3a194d2e9095ab232c9784b4e6b678ca66f99cde6b386bcf31148ea63 -SIZE (quictls-openssl-3.0.8-183e548d93a6aeedab0fd6cb737923a93f807b83_GH0.tar.gz) = 15323766 +TIMESTAMP = 1686556357 +SHA256 (quictls-openssl-3.0.9-d2cc208d34cfe2b56d4ef8bcd8e3983a4d00d6bd_GH0.tar.gz) = d8604ccf92af54fd89f71bfe1996018ed9bcf69edf9af385a45c7ad2b202ee11 +SIZE (quictls-openssl-3.0.9-d2cc208d34cfe2b56d4ef8bcd8e3983a4d00d6bd_GH0.tar.gz) = 15355867 diff --git a/security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 b/security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 deleted file mode 100644 index 8f5518d1f191..000000000000 --- a/security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,293 +0,0 @@ -From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Pauli -Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100 -Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints - -A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions -of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains -that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this -vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers -exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service -(DoS) attack on affected systems. - -Fixes CVE-2023-0464 - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568) ---- - crypto/x509/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++- - crypto/x509/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++--- - crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- - 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h -index 18b53cc09ebf..cba107ca0358 100644 ---- crypto/x509/pcy_local.h.orig -+++ crypto/x509/pcy_local.h -@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st { - }; - - struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st { -+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */ -+ size_t node_count; -+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */ -+ size_t node_maximum; -+ - /* This is the tree 'level' data */ - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels; - int nlevel; -@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk, - X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data, - X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, -- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree); -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, -+ int extra_data); - void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node); - int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl, - const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid); -diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c -index 9d9a7ea1799c..450f95a655fb 100644 ---- crypto/x509/pcy_node.c.orig -+++ crypto/x509/pcy_node.c -@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data, - X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, -- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, -+ int extra_data) - { - X509_POLICY_NODE *node; - -+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */ -+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum) -+ return NULL; -+ - node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node)); - if (node == NULL) { - ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE); -@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - node->data = data; - node->parent = parent; -- if (level) { -+ if (level != NULL) { - if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) { - if (level->anyPolicy) - goto node_error; -@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - } - -- if (tree) { -+ if (extra_data) { - if (tree->extra_data == NULL) - tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null(); - if (tree->extra_data == NULL){ -@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - } - -+ tree->node_count++; - if (parent) - parent->nchild++; - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c -index fa45da5117a1..f953a05a41a6 100644 ---- crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c.orig -+++ crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c -@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ - - #include "pcy_local.h" - -+/* -+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to -+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes. -+ * -+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the -+ * door on CVE-2023-0464. -+ */ -+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX -+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000 -+#endif -+ - static void expected_print(BIO *channel, - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node, - int indent) -@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; - } - -+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */ -+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX; -+ - /* - * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3. - * -@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL, - OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL) - goto bad_tree; -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) { -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) { - ossl_policy_data_free(data); - goto bad_tree; - } -@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise - */ - static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, -- X509_POLICY_DATA *data) -+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data, -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - { - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1; - int i, matched = 0; -@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i); - - if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) { -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL) -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - matched = 1; - } - } - if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) { -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - } - return 1; -@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise. - */ - static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, -- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache) -+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache, -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - { - int i; - -@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i); - - /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */ -- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data)) -+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree)) - return 0; - } - return 1; -@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */ - data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set; - data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS; -- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) { -+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) { - ossl_policy_data_free(data); - return 0; - } -@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */ - if (last->anyPolicy && - ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, -- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) -+ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - return 1; - } -@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, - extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS - | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE; - node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, -- tree); -+ tree, 1); - } - if (!tree->user_policies) { - tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null(); -@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - - for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) { - cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert); -- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache)) -+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree)) - return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; - - if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY) -From 2389cdc9f74268a0d5164a998929ffe50102c0eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Richard Levitte -Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:44:20 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Prepare for 3.0.9 - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -Release: yes ---- - CHANGES.md | 4 ++++ - NEWS.md | 4 ++++ - VERSION.dat | 4 ++-- - 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md -index 7cdd9d974536..0e4fdebfde4e 100644 ---- CHANGES.md.orig -+++ CHANGES.md -@@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ breaking changes, and mappings for the large list of deprecated functions. - - [Migration guide]: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/tree/master/doc/man7/migration_guide.pod - -+### Changes between 3.0.8 and 3.0.9 [xx XXX xxxx] -+ -+ * none yet -+ - ### Changes between 3.0.7 and 3.0.8 [7 Feb 2023] - - * Fixed NULL dereference during PKCS7 data verification. -diff --git a/NEWS.md b/NEWS.md -index 36dbfa72f6d5..e7a23e908c1f 100644 ---- NEWS.md.orig -+++ NEWS.md -@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ OpenSSL Releases - OpenSSL 3.0 - ----------- - -+### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0.8 and OpenSSL 3.0.9 [under development] -+ -+ * none -+ - ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0.7 and OpenSSL 3.0.8 [7 Feb 2023] - - * Fixed NULL dereference during PKCS7 data verification ([CVE-2023-0401]) -From f8fe66e3f13350b527da871183b727e0fb9632ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Pauli -Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:18:53 +1100 -Subject: [PATCH] changes: note about policy tree size limits and circumvention - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568) ---- - CHANGES.md | 9 ++++++++- - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md -index 2ba422c09a32..3eddb6f10e02 100644 ---- CHANGES.md.orig -+++ CHANGES.md -@@ -30,7 +30,14 @@ breaking changes, and mappings for the large list of deprecated functions. - - ### Changes between 3.0.8 and 3.0.9 [xx XXX xxxx] - -- * none yet -+ * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate -+ against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which -+ should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit -+ can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build -+ time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow -+ unlimited growth. -+ -+ *Paul Dale* - - ### Changes between 3.0.7 and 3.0.8 [7 Feb 2023] - diff --git a/security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 b/security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 deleted file mode 100644 index bf1edbf2e618..000000000000 --- a/security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,126 +0,0 @@ -From 9a1410bd393c594f852222392c36bc7895d82d57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matt Caswell -Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:31:25 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] Updated CHANGES.md and NEWS.md for CVE-2023-0465 - -Also updated the entries for CVE-2023-0464 - -Related-to: CVE-2023-0465 - -Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587) ---- - CHANGES.md | 12 ++++++++++++ - NEWS.md | 6 +++++- - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md -index 3eddb6f10e02..31cc6095cc3b 100644 ---- CHANGES.md.orig -+++ CHANGES.md -@@ -30,12 +30,22 @@ breaking changes, and mappings for the large list of deprecated functions. - - ### Changes between 3.0.8 and 3.0.9 [xx XXX xxxx] - -+ * Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are -+ silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped -+ for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert -+ invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the -+ certificate altogether. -+ ([CVE-2023-0465]) -+ -+ *Matt Caswell* -+ - * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate - against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which - should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit - can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build - time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow - unlimited growth. -+ ([CVE-2023-0464]) - - *Paul Dale* - -@@ -19589,6 +19599,8 @@ ndif - - - -+[CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465 -+[CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464 - [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401 - [CVE-2023-0286]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0286 - [CVE-2023-0217]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0217 -diff --git a/NEWS.md b/NEWS.md -index c6e4926bd527..7fe2ff15d97e 100644 ---- NEWS.md.orig -+++ NEWS.md -@@ -20,7 +20,9 @@ OpenSSL 3.0 - - ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0.8 and OpenSSL 3.0.9 [under development] - -- * none -+ * Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates -+ ([CVE-2023-0465]) -+ * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464]) - - ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0.7 and OpenSSL 3.0.8 [7 Feb 2023] - -@@ -1434,6 +1436,8 @@ OpenSSL 0.9.x - * Support for various new platforms - - -+[CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465 -+[CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464 - [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401 - [CVE-2023-0286]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0286 - [CVE-2023-0217]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0217 -From 1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matt Caswell -Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf - certs - -Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we -later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf -cert was bad. - -Fixes: CVE-2023-0465 - -Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587) ---- - crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 12 ++++++++++-- - 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -index 9384f1da9bad..a0282c3ef121 100644 ---- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c.orig -+++ crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx) - goto memerr; - /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */ - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) { -- int i; -+ int i, cbcalled = 0; - - /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */ -- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { -+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { - X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i); - -+ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0) -+ cbcalled = 1; - CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0, - ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); - } -+ if (!cbcalled) { -+ /* Should not be able to get here */ -+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR); -+ return 0; -+ } -+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */ - return 1; - } - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) { diff --git a/security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 b/security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 deleted file mode 100644 index 9922f2afd95d..000000000000 --- a/security/openssl-quictls/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,91 +0,0 @@ -From 51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Tomas Mraz -Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:15:47 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() - -The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking. - -Fixes: CVE-2023-0466 - -Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell -Reviewed-by: Paul Dale -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20563) ---- - CHANGES.md | 8 ++++++++ - NEWS.md | 2 ++ - doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod | 9 +++++++-- - 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md -index 31cc6095cc3b..eb948e6b746b 100644 ---- CHANGES.md.orig -+++ CHANGES.md -@@ -30,6 +30,13 @@ breaking changes, and mappings for the large list of deprecated functions. - - ### Changes between 3.0.8 and 3.0.9 [xx XXX xxxx] - -+ * Corrected documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() to mention -+ that it does not enable policy checking. Thanks to David Benjamin for -+ discovering this issue. -+ ([CVE-2023-0466]) -+ -+ *Tomáš Mráz* -+ - * Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are - silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped - for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert -@@ -19599,6 +19606,7 @@ ndif - - - -+[CVE-2023-0466]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0466 - [CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465 - [CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464 - [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401 -diff --git a/NEWS.md b/NEWS.md -index 7fe2ff15d97e..61f82603acbe 100644 ---- NEWS.md.orig -+++ NEWS.md -@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ OpenSSL 3.0 - - ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0.8 and OpenSSL 3.0.9 [under development] - -+ * Fixed documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() ([CVE-2023-0466]) - * Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates - ([CVE-2023-0465]) - * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464]) -@@ -1436,6 +1437,7 @@ OpenSSL 0.9.x - * Support for various new platforms - - -+[CVE-2023-0466]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0466 - [CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465 - [CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464 - [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401 -diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod -index 75a167702296..43c1900bca78 100644 ---- doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod.orig -+++ doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod -@@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ B. - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B to - B. Normally the current time is used. - --X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled --by default) and adds B to the acceptable policy set. -+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B to the acceptable policy set. -+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable -+policy checking. - - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled - by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B. Any existing -@@ -400,6 +401,10 @@ The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i. - The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_host(), X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_email(), - and X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get1_ip_asc() functions were added in OpenSSL 3.0. - -+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as -+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this. -+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation. -+ - =head1 COPYRIGHT - - Copyright 2009-2023 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.