quoting from
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice/2009-December/004440.html
> OpenOffice.org community officially announced that
> "end-of-life" for version 2.x of its productivity suite
> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=announce&msgNo=407
> .
> For FreeBSD ports tree - my policy is -
> I'll remove ports/editors/openoffice.org-2-RC soon, and mark as IGNORE
> for ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/ in the near future.
>
> Please contact me (maho at FreeBSD.org - I'm a de facto maintainer of this port),
> if you want to maintain "ports/editors/openoffice.org-2" port.
> I expect you to fix build issues, security issues, etc by back porting.
Thanks for all who loves OpenOffice.org. Sayonara, soshite arigatou (good-bye
and thank you)...
Feature safe: yes
I tested on -current/amd64 past the utmpx change and on
8.0-RELEASE-p2/i386 for the old code path.
Reviewed: Giorgos Keramidas (maintainer)
Approved: Pav Lucistnik (for portmgr)
Feature safe: yes
- I'm not sure why this version requirement in Build.PL failed. But
our minimal perl version is 5.8.9 now, so we can omit this check.
Approved by: pav (implicit)
Approved by: portmgr (miwi)
audio/ccaudio||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 4 months
audio/py-libmpdclient||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
chinese/gbk2uni||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 6 months
chinese/iiimf-le-xcin||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
devel/adabindx||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
devel/agide||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 6 months
devel/asis||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
devel/callgrind||2010-01-18|Has expired: Included in devel/valgrind
devel/florist||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
editors/xml2rfc-xxe||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 4 months
graphics/gephex||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
graphics/irit||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
graphics/pixieplus||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 6 months
japanese/expect||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
lang/pnetc||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 5 months
mail/libnewmail||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
net-mgmt/flowscan||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 5 months
net/astmanproxy||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
palm/prc-tools||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 4 months
print/latex-msc||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
science/xloops-ginac||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
shells/bush||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
textproc/iiimf-gnome-im-switcher||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 4 months
textproc/iiimf-gtk||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
x11-toolkits/gtkada-devel||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
x11-toolkits/gtkada||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 3 months
x11-wm/ion-2||2010-01-18|Has expired: has been broken for 4 months
PR: ports/136065 ports/127469
Submitted by: N.J. Mann <njm@njm.me.uk> and Aldis Berjoza <killasmurf86@gmail.com>
- Early identify port CONFLICTS
PR: 137855
Submitted by: Piotr Smyrak <smyru@heron.pl>
- Add --no-same-permissions to the EXTRACT_AFTER_ARGS command.
Tijl Coosemans has been reported an issue that when root is extracting from the
tarball, and the tarball contains world writable files
(sysutils/policykit as an example), there is a chance that the files
gets changed by malicious third parties right after the extraction,
which makes it possible to inject code into the package thus compromise
the system.
Submitted by: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org> Xin LI (delphij@)
- Fix some whitespaces
Tested with: exp-run
e-mail addresses from the pkg-descr file that could reasonably
be mistaken for maintainer contact information in order to avoid
confusion on the part of users looking for support. As a pleasant
side effect this also avoids confusion and/or frustration for people
who are no longer maintaining those ports.
PR/137956 by Ashish SHUKLA (thanks!). [1]
Those ports which define EMACS_PORT_NAME to be "emacs21" were
not touched (this time). They may be converted to the new
world order by removing the above mentioned assignment.
Four ports were marked as BROKEN with EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs23
(they do not compile):
. lang/bigloo;
. mail/wanderlust;
. mail/wanderlust-devel;
. www/emacs-w3m.
Three ports were marked as IGNORE with EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs23:
. japanese/egg-canna (the port version is dated as of 2001,
does not compile with Emacs 23 and seems it cannot be fixed);
. deskutils/remember.el (was incorporated into Emacs 23);
. editors/nxml (was incorporated into Emacs 23).
Changes that were made after (and as a result of) exp run. For
those ports:
. japanese/migemo-emacs21;
. japanese/migemo-emacs22
EMACS_PORT_NAME?= was changed to EMACS_PORT_NAME= to the apropriate
emacs port name.
PR: ports/137956 [1], ports/141369 [2]
Submitted by: Ashish SHUKLA <wahjava at gmail.com> [1],
bsam (me) [2]
Exp-run by: miwi
porting patch must fill and send SCA.
http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html#usinglicenses
> 3. Do I have to fill out a SCA?
> Yes, if you intend to contribute source code or other
> materials which are intended to be compiled or otherwise
> integrated with the OpenOffice.org product, regardless of the
> size of the contribution (e.g., including contributions of 10
> lines or less). However we encourage all contributors to the
> OpenOffice.org website domain, including the wiki, to fill
> out the SCA, as it streamlines the process for all.
see also http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/#policy
Funded by: OpenOffice.org community
