Specifically, newer autoconf (> 2.13) has different semantic of the
configure target. In short, one should use --build=CONFIGURE_TARGET
instead of CONFIGURE_TARGET directly. Otherwise, you will get a warning
and the old semantic may be removed in later autoconf releases.
To workaround this issue, many ports hack the CONFIGURE_TARGET variable
so that it contains the ``--build='' prefix.
To solve this issue, under the fact that some ports still have
configure script generated by the old autoconf, we use runtime detection
in the do-configure target so that the proper argument can be used.
Changes to Mk/*:
- Add runtime detection magic in bsd.port.mk
- Remove CONFIGURE_TARGET hack in various bsd.*.mk
- USE_GNOME=gnometarget is now an no-op
Changes to individual ports, other than removing the CONFIGURE_TARGET hack:
= pkg-plist changed (due to the ugly CONFIGURE_TARGET prefix in * executables)
- comms/gnuradio
- science/abinit
- science/elmer-fem
- science/elmer-matc
- science/elmer-meshgen2d
- science/elmerfront
- science/elmerpost
= use x86_64 as ARCH
- devel/g-wrap
= other changes
- print/magicfilter
GNU_CONFIGURE -> HAS_CONFIGURE since it's not generated by autoconf
Total # of ports modified: 1,027
Total # of ports affected: ~7,000 (set GNU_CONFIGURE to yes)
PR: 126524 (obsoletes 52917)
Submitted by: rafan
Tested on: two pointyhat 7-amd64 exp runs (by pav)
Approved by: portmgr (pav)
- repocopy [files/milter-greylist.sh -> files/milter-greylist.in, pkg-message -> files/pkg-message.in]
itectu@: no more .sh
- Bump PORTREVISION
- Broken messages are not quoted
- silence some portlint tab warnings
- seperate NOPORTDOCS from NOPORTEXAMPLES
- drop 5.x support
- use SUB_FILES for pkg-message processing
- make use of @dirrmtry in pkg-plist
PR: 125653
Submitted by: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> (almost all)
grey listing. Grey listing is a spam filtering technique, which uses a behavior
trick: spammers never resend a message when they get a temporary error,
whereas real MTA do. The idea is to refuse any mail on first attempt, and
accept it after some time has elapsed.
PR: ports/67252
Submitted by: Cyril Guibourg <aragorn+ports@teaser.fr>
