a12058fae3
The 8.9p1 update was supposed to have a fix for incorrect
use of procctl(2) but was left out for some reason. A wrong
assumption missed keeping it in ae66cffc19.
PR: 262352
21 lines
673 B
C
21 lines
673 B
C
--- platform-tracing.c.orig 2022-03-07 14:48:27.152541000 -0800
|
|
+++ platform-tracing.c 2022-03-07 14:56:33.402458000 -0800
|
|
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
|
|
#include <stdarg.h>
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
|
+#if defined(HAVE_PROCCTL)
|
|
+#include <unistd.h>
|
|
+#endif
|
|
|
|
#include "log.h"
|
|
|
|
@@ -42,7 +45,7 @@ platform_disable_tracing(int strict)
|
|
/* On FreeBSD, we should make this process untraceable */
|
|
int disable_trace = PROC_TRACE_CTL_DISABLE;
|
|
|
|
- if (procctl(P_PID, 0, PROC_TRACE_CTL, &disable_trace) && strict)
|
|
+ if (procctl(P_PID, getpid(), PROC_TRACE_CTL, &disable_trace) && strict)
|
|
fatal("unable to make the process untraceable: %s",
|
|
strerror(errno));
|
|
#endif
|