freebsd-ports/lang/perl5.8/files
Mark Linimon 7047959f24 Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR
was to test what happened when we did eventually delete these two
ports, not to delete them immediately.

A subsequent commit will add appropriate deprecation messages.

Hat:		portmgr
PR:		ports/165457
Feature safe:	yes (actually no, however, this is to preserve POLA)
2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
..
patch-bug64562 Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
patch-Configure Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
patch-freebsd.sh Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
patch-freebsd.sh-freebsd10 Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
patch-INST_PREFIX.t Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
patch-MM_Any.pm Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
patch-perl.c Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
patch-sv.c Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
perl-after-upgrade Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
perl-man.conf Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00
use.perl Undo ports/165457 to not violate POLA. As far as I knew, the PR 2012-03-11 23:49:09 +00:00