226faa7c29
to go about their rotten business. It is issued without acknowledgment of any obligation, in response to ports/64393. The patch does NOT bump PORTREVISION as the change is invisible for the port's or package's users. $FreeBSD$ is sufficient. I also refute any "bug" with respect to the the porter's handbook's pages referenced in ports/64393, my port has not written anything after bsd.port.mk and portlint has nothing to complain about (only that it can't figure "patch" is legal in a PATCHFILES variable). Informational: tools that assume .include <bsd.port.[post.]mk> was the last line in a port's makefile are broken. They should be comparing the output of realpath $(make -V MASTERDIR) against the output of realpath $(pwd) instead: -bash-2.05b$ realpath $(pwd) /usr/home/ma/db42 -bash-2.05b$ realpath $(make -V MASTERDIR) /usr/home/ma/db42 -bash-2.05b$ cd ../db42-nocrypto # switch to slave's port directory -bash-2.05b$ realpath $(make -V MASTERDIR) /usr/home/ma/db42 -bash-2.05b$ realpath $(pwd) /usr/home/ma/db42-nocrypto PR: 64479 Submitted by: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> (maintainer) |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| files | ||
| distinfo | ||
| Makefile | ||
| Makefile.db | ||
| pkg-descr | ||
| pkg-plist | ||