freebsd-ports/lang/gcc10-devel/files/patch-gfortran-libgcc
Gerald Pfeifer 3df579626d Update to the 20190512 snapshot of GCC 10.0.0. This brings a new binary
bin/lto-dump which may be helpful if you employ link-time optimization (LTO).

Forward port r499061 | gerald | 2019-04-15 from lang/gcc8 and gcc8-devel [1]:

  GCC has two runtime libraries:  The static library libgcc.a (-lgcc) and
  the shared library libgcc_s.so (-lgcc_s).  Both implement many of the
  same functions but they also each have their unique functions.  When
  GCC links programs and libraries there are three possibilities:

  1. gcc -static-libgcc or gcc -static: -lgcc
     => Just use libgcc.a.

  2. gcc -shared-libgcc: -lgcc_s -lgcc
     => Link with libgcc_s first, so libgcc.a is only used for its unique
        functions.

  3. gcc: -lgcc -Wl,--as-needed -lgcc_s -Wl,--no-as-needed
     => Link with libgcc.a first so libgcc_s is only used for its unique
        functions (_Unwind_* functions).

  Approach 3 is the default for gcc and it's also what clang and clang++ use;
  approach 2 is the default for gfortran, g++ and probably other front ends.

  This patch makes 3 the default for gfortran.  It significantly reduces
  the use of libgcc_s.  The _Unwind_* functions are also available in the
  old base system libgcc_s which means this reduces the need for
  -rpath /usr/local/lib/gccN in ports that depend on libraries built with
  gfortran.  Consider a dependency tree like this:

    prog -> libA -> libgcc_s (old base system libgcc_s is fine)
         -> libB -> libgcc_s (libB built with gfortran, needs new libgcc_s)

  Here prog needs to be linked with -rpath /usr/local/lib/gccN even if it's
  a normal C program compiled with clang.  Without -rpath it will fail to
  start because it loads old libgcc_s first as a dependency of libA and then
  it fails to load libB.  With this patch libB works with old base system
  libgcc_s or may not need libgcc_s at all, so prog does not need to be
  linked with -rpath.

PR:		208120 [1]
Submitted by:	tijl [1]
2019-05-15 10:02:37 +00:00

70 lines
2.8 KiB
Text

GCC has two runtime libraries: The static library libgcc.a (-lgcc) and
the shared library libgcc_s.so (-lgcc_s). Both implement many of the
same functions but they also each have their unique functions. When
gcc links programs and libraries there are three possibilities:
1. gcc -static-libgcc or gcc -static: -lgcc
=> Just use libgcc.a.
2. gcc -shared-libgcc: -lgcc_s -lgcc
=> Link with libgcc_s first, so libgcc.a is only used for its unique
functions.
3. gcc: -lgcc -Wl,--as-needed -lgcc_s -Wl,--no-as-needed
=> Link with libgcc.a first so libgcc_s is only used for its unique
functions (_Unwind_* functions).
Approach 3 is the default for gcc and it's also what clang and clang++ use;
approach 2 is the default for gfortran, g++ and probably other front ends.
This patch makes 3 the default for gfortran. It significantly reduces
the use of libgcc_s. The _Unwind_* functions are also available in the
old base system libgcc_s which means this reduces the need for
-rpath /usr/local/lib/gccN in ports that depend on libraries built with
gfortran. Consider a dependency tree like this:
prog -> libA -> libgcc_s (old base system libgcc_s is fine)
-> libB -> libgcc_s (libB built with gfortran, needs new libgcc_s)
Here prog needs to be linked with -rpath /usr/local/lib/gccN even if it's
a normal C program compiled with clang. Without -rpath it will fail to
start because it loads old libgcc_s first as a dependency of libA and then
it fails to load libB. With this patch libB works with old base system
libgcc_s or may not need libgcc_s at all, so prog does not need to be
linked with -rpath.
Upstream is unlikely accept a patch like this because libgfortran calls
some _Unwind_* functions and so always needs libgcc_s. Also because
every Fortran program and library links to libgfortran it makes sense
that option 2 above is the default. On FreeBSD where clang and GCC
compiled code can be mixed and where multiple libgcc_s may be installed,
option 3 is just a lot easier to deal with.
The bug that sparked this is PR 208120 (but note there's a lot of
misleading information in that bug. CMake is not actually doing
anything wrong.)
--- UTC
--- gcc/fortran/gfortranspec.c.orig 2015-06-26 17:47:23 UTC
+++ gcc/fortran/gfortranspec.c
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ For more information about these matters
}
}
-#ifdef ENABLE_SHARED_LIBGCC
+#if 0
if (library)
{
unsigned int i;
--- libgfortran/Makefile.in.orig 2019-02-22 14:22:13.000000000 +0000
+++ libgfortran/Makefile.in 2019-02-27 16:27:08.856408000 +0000
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@
$(LTLDFLAGS) $(LIBQUADLIB) ../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la \
$(HWCAP_LDFLAGS) \
-lm $(extra_ldflags_libgfortran) \
- $(version_arg) -Wc,-shared-libgcc
+ $(version_arg)
libgfortran_la_DEPENDENCIES = $(version_dep) libgfortran.spec $(LIBQUADLIB_DEP)
cafexeclib_LTLIBRARIES = libcaf_single.la