2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
Remote Processor Framework
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modern SoCs typically have heterogeneous remote processor devices in asymmetric
|
|
|
|
multiprocessing (AMP) configurations, which may be running different instances
|
|
|
|
of operating system, whether it's Linux or any other flavor of real-time OS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMAP4, for example, has dual Cortex-A9, dual Cortex-M3 and a C64x+ DSP.
|
|
|
|
In a typical configuration, the dual cortex-A9 is running Linux in a SMP
|
|
|
|
configuration, and each of the other three cores (two M3 cores and a DSP)
|
|
|
|
is running its own instance of RTOS in an AMP configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remoteproc framework allows different platforms/architectures to
|
|
|
|
control (power on, load firmware, power off) those remote processors while
|
|
|
|
abstracting the hardware differences, so the entire driver doesn't need to be
|
|
|
|
duplicated. In addition, this framework also adds rpmsg virtio devices
|
|
|
|
for remote processors that supports this kind of communication. This way,
|
|
|
|
platform-specific remoteproc drivers only need to provide a few low-level
|
|
|
|
handlers, and then all rpmsg drivers will then just work
|
|
|
|
(for more information about the virtio-based rpmsg bus and its drivers,
|
|
|
|
please read Documentation/rpmsg.txt).
|
2012-02-13 22:30:39 +01:00
|
|
|
Registration of other types of virtio devices is now also possible. Firmwares
|
|
|
|
just need to publish what kind of virtio devices do they support, and then
|
|
|
|
remoteproc will add those devices. This makes it possible to reuse the
|
|
|
|
existing virtio drivers with remote processor backends at a minimal development
|
|
|
|
cost.
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. User API
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
|
|
|
|
- Boot a remote processor (i.e. load its firmware, power it on, ...).
|
|
|
|
If the remote processor is already powered on, this function immediately
|
|
|
|
returns (successfully).
|
|
|
|
Returns 0 on success, and an appropriate error value otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Note: to use this function you should already have a valid rproc
|
|
|
|
handle. There are several ways to achieve that cleanly (devres, pdata,
|
|
|
|
the way remoteproc_rpmsg.c does this, or, if this becomes prevalent, we
|
|
|
|
might also consider using dev_archdata for this). See also
|
|
|
|
rproc_get_by_name() below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
|
|
|
|
- Power off a remote processor (previously booted with rproc_boot()).
|
|
|
|
In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
|
|
|
|
this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
|
|
|
|
without really powering off the device.
|
|
|
|
Every call to rproc_boot() must (eventually) be accompanied by a call
|
|
|
|
to rproc_shutdown(). Calling rproc_shutdown() redundantly is a bug.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- we're not decrementing the rproc's refcount, only the power refcount.
|
|
|
|
which means that the @rproc handle stays valid even after
|
|
|
|
rproc_shutdown() returns, and users can still use it with a subsequent
|
|
|
|
rproc_boot(), if needed.
|
|
|
|
- don't call rproc_shutdown() to unroll rproc_get_by_name(), exactly
|
|
|
|
because rproc_shutdown() _does not_ decrement the refcount of @rproc.
|
|
|
|
To decrement the refcount of @rproc, use rproc_put() (but _only_ if
|
|
|
|
you acquired @rproc using rproc_get_by_name()).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct rproc *rproc_get_by_name(const char *name)
|
|
|
|
- Find an rproc handle using the remote processor's name, and then
|
|
|
|
boot it. If it's already powered on, then just immediately return
|
|
|
|
(successfully). Returns the rproc handle on success, and NULL on failure.
|
|
|
|
This function increments the remote processor's refcount, so always
|
|
|
|
use rproc_put() to decrement it back once rproc isn't needed anymore.
|
|
|
|
Note: currently rproc_get_by_name() and rproc_put() are not used anymore
|
|
|
|
by the rpmsg bus and its drivers. We need to scrutinize the use cases
|
|
|
|
that still need them, and see if we can migrate them to use the non
|
|
|
|
name-based boot/shutdown interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc)
|
|
|
|
- Decrement @rproc's power refcount and shut it down if it reaches zero
|
|
|
|
(essentially by just calling rproc_shutdown), and then decrement @rproc's
|
|
|
|
validity refcount too.
|
|
|
|
After this function returns, @rproc may _not_ be used anymore, and its
|
|
|
|
handle should be considered invalid.
|
|
|
|
This function should be called _iff_ the @rproc handle was grabbed by
|
|
|
|
calling rproc_get_by_name().
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Typical usage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* in case we were given a valid 'rproc' handle */
|
|
|
|
int dummy_rproc_example(struct rproc *my_rproc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* let's power on and boot our remote processor */
|
|
|
|
ret = rproc_boot(my_rproc);
|
|
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* something went wrong. handle it and leave.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* our remote processor is now powered on... give it some work
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* let's shut it down now */
|
|
|
|
rproc_shutdown(my_rproc);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. API for implementors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
|
|
|
|
const struct rproc_ops *ops,
|
|
|
|
const char *firmware, int len)
|
|
|
|
- Allocate a new remote processor handle, but don't register
|
|
|
|
it yet. Required parameters are the underlying device, the
|
|
|
|
name of this remote processor, platform-specific ops handlers,
|
|
|
|
the name of the firmware to boot this rproc with, and the
|
|
|
|
length of private data needed by the allocating rproc driver (in bytes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This function should be used by rproc implementations during
|
|
|
|
initialization of the remote processor.
|
|
|
|
After creating an rproc handle using this function, and when ready,
|
|
|
|
implementations should then call rproc_register() to complete
|
|
|
|
the registration of the remote processor.
|
|
|
|
On success, the new rproc is returned, and on failure, NULL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: _never_ directly deallocate @rproc, even if it was not registered
|
2012-07-02 10:41:16 +02:00
|
|
|
yet. Instead, when you need to unroll rproc_alloc(), use rproc_free().
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void rproc_free(struct rproc *rproc)
|
|
|
|
- Free an rproc handle that was allocated by rproc_alloc.
|
2012-07-02 10:41:16 +02:00
|
|
|
This function essentially unrolls rproc_alloc(), by decrementing the
|
|
|
|
rproc's refcount. It doesn't directly free rproc; that would happen
|
|
|
|
only if there are no other references to rproc and its refcount now
|
|
|
|
dropped to zero.
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int rproc_register(struct rproc *rproc)
|
|
|
|
- Register @rproc with the remoteproc framework, after it has been
|
|
|
|
allocated with rproc_alloc().
|
|
|
|
This is called by the platform-specific rproc implementation, whenever
|
|
|
|
a new remote processor device is probed.
|
|
|
|
Returns 0 on success and an appropriate error code otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Note: this function initiates an asynchronous firmware loading
|
|
|
|
context, which will look for virtio devices supported by the rproc's
|
|
|
|
firmware.
|
|
|
|
If found, those virtio devices will be created and added, so as a result
|
|
|
|
of registering this remote processor, additional virtio drivers might get
|
|
|
|
probed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int rproc_unregister(struct rproc *rproc)
|
2012-07-02 10:41:16 +02:00
|
|
|
- Unroll rproc_register().
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
This function should be called when the platform specific rproc
|
|
|
|
implementation decides to remove the rproc device. it should
|
|
|
|
_only_ be called if a previous invocation of rproc_register()
|
|
|
|
has completed successfully.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-02 10:41:16 +02:00
|
|
|
After rproc_unregister() returns, @rproc is still valid, and its
|
|
|
|
last refcount should be decremented by calling rproc_free().
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns 0 on success and -EINVAL if @rproc isn't valid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Implementation callbacks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These callbacks should be provided by platform-specific remoteproc
|
|
|
|
drivers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
|
|
|
|
* @start: power on the device and boot it
|
|
|
|
* @stop: power off the device
|
|
|
|
* @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct rproc_ops {
|
|
|
|
int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
|
|
|
|
int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
|
|
|
|
void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every remoteproc implementation should at least provide the ->start and ->stop
|
2012-02-13 22:30:39 +01:00
|
|
|
handlers. If rpmsg/virtio functionality is also desired, then the ->kick handler
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
should be provided as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ->start() handler takes an rproc handle and should then power on the
|
|
|
|
device and boot it (use rproc->priv to access platform-specific private data).
|
|
|
|
The boot address, in case needed, can be found in rproc->bootaddr (remoteproc
|
|
|
|
core puts there the ELF entry point).
|
|
|
|
On success, 0 should be returned, and on failure, an appropriate error code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ->stop() handler takes an rproc handle and powers the device down.
|
|
|
|
On success, 0 is returned, and on failure, an appropriate error code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ->kick() handler takes an rproc handle, and an index of a virtqueue
|
|
|
|
where new message was placed in. Implementations should interrupt the remote
|
|
|
|
processor and let it know it has pending messages. Notifying remote processors
|
|
|
|
the exact virtqueue index to look in is optional: it is easy (and not
|
|
|
|
too expensive) to go through the existing virtqueues and look for new buffers
|
|
|
|
in the used rings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Binary Firmware Structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this point remoteproc only supports ELF32 firmware binaries. However,
|
|
|
|
it is quite expected that other platforms/devices which we'd want to
|
|
|
|
support with this framework will be based on different binary formats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When those use cases show up, we will have to decouple the binary format
|
|
|
|
from the framework core, so we can support several binary formats without
|
|
|
|
duplicating common code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the firmware is parsed, its various segments are loaded to memory
|
|
|
|
according to the specified device address (might be a physical address
|
|
|
|
if the remote processor is accessing memory directly).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would
|
|
|
|
also include a special section which we call "the resource table".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The resource table contains system resources that the remote processor
|
|
|
|
requires before it should be powered on, such as allocation of physically
|
|
|
|
contiguous memory, or iommu mapping of certain on-chip peripherals.
|
|
|
|
Remotecore will only power up the device after all the resource table's
|
|
|
|
requirement are met.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to system resources, the resource table may also contain
|
|
|
|
resource entries that publish the existence of supported features
|
|
|
|
or configurations by the remote processor, such as trace buffers and
|
|
|
|
supported virtio devices (and their configurations).
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
The resource table begins with this header:
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
* struct resource_table - firmware resource table header
|
|
|
|
* @ver: version number
|
|
|
|
* @num: number of resource entries
|
|
|
|
* @reserved: reserved (must be zero)
|
|
|
|
* @offset: array of offsets pointing at the various resource entries
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The header of the resource table, as expressed by this structure,
|
|
|
|
* contains a version number (should we need to change this format in the
|
|
|
|
* future), the number of available resource entries, and their offsets
|
|
|
|
* in the table.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct resource_table {
|
|
|
|
u32 ver;
|
|
|
|
u32 num;
|
|
|
|
u32 reserved[2];
|
|
|
|
u32 offset[0];
|
|
|
|
} __packed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediately following this header are the resource entries themselves,
|
|
|
|
each of which begins with the following resource entry header:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* struct fw_rsc_hdr - firmware resource entry header
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
* @type: resource type
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
* @data: resource data
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Every resource entry begins with a 'struct fw_rsc_hdr' header providing
|
|
|
|
* its @type. The content of the entry itself will immediately follow
|
|
|
|
* this header, and it should be parsed according to the resource type.
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
struct fw_rsc_hdr {
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
u32 type;
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
u8 data[0];
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
} __packed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some resources entries are mere announcements, where the host is informed
|
|
|
|
of specific remoteproc configuration. Other entries require the host to
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
do something (e.g. allocate a system resource). Sometimes a negotiation
|
|
|
|
is expected, where the firmware requests a resource, and once allocated,
|
|
|
|
the host should provide back its details (e.g. address of an allocated
|
|
|
|
memory region).
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
Here are the various resource types that are currently supported:
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* enum fw_resource_type - types of resource entries
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @RSC_CARVEOUT: request for allocation of a physically contiguous
|
|
|
|
* memory region.
|
|
|
|
* @RSC_DEVMEM: request to iommu_map a memory-based peripheral.
|
|
|
|
* @RSC_TRACE: announces the availability of a trace buffer into which
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
* the remote processor will be writing logs.
|
|
|
|
* @RSC_VDEV: declare support for a virtio device, and serve as its
|
|
|
|
* virtio header.
|
|
|
|
* @RSC_LAST: just keep this one at the end
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Please note that these values are used as indices to the rproc_handle_rsc
|
|
|
|
* lookup table, so please keep them sane. Moreover, @RSC_LAST is used to
|
|
|
|
* check the validity of an index before the lookup table is accessed, so
|
|
|
|
* please update it as needed.
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
enum fw_resource_type {
|
|
|
|
RSC_CARVEOUT = 0,
|
|
|
|
RSC_DEVMEM = 1,
|
|
|
|
RSC_TRACE = 2,
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
RSC_VDEV = 3,
|
|
|
|
RSC_LAST = 4,
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
For more details regarding a specific resource type, please see its
|
|
|
|
dedicated structure in include/linux/remoteproc.h.
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also expect that platform-specific resource entries will show up
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
at some point. When that happens, we could easily add a new RSC_PLATFORM
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
type, and hand those resources to the platform-specific rproc driver to handle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Virtio and remoteproc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The firmware should provide remoteproc information about virtio devices
|
2012-02-01 20:56:16 +01:00
|
|
|
that it supports, and their configurations: a RSC_VDEV resource entry
|
|
|
|
should specify the virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h), virtio features,
|
|
|
|
virtio config space, vrings information, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a new remote processor is registered, the remoteproc framework
|
|
|
|
will look for its resource table and will register the virtio devices
|
|
|
|
it supports. A firmware may support any number of virtio devices, and
|
|
|
|
of any type (a single remote processor can also easily support several
|
|
|
|
rpmsg virtio devices this way, if desired).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, RSC_VDEV resource entries are only good enough for static
|
2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02:00
|
|
|
allocation of virtio devices. Dynamic allocations will also be made possible
|
|
|
|
using the rpmsg bus (similar to how we already do dynamic allocations of
|
|
|
|
rpmsg channels; read more about it in rpmsg.txt).
|