rescounter: remove __must_check from res_counter_charge_nofail()
Since we will succeed with the allocation no matter what, there isn't a need to use __must_check with it. It can very well be optional. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f3479b147
commit
04eac7ffde
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ int __must_check res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
|
|||
unsigned long val, bool force);
|
||||
int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
|
||||
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
|
||||
int __must_check res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
|
||||
int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
|
||||
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue