perf intel-pt: Rationalize intel_pt_sync_switch()'s use of next_tid
Returning 1 from intel_pt_sync_switch() causes the current tid to be set. That negates the need to keep next_tid anymore. Rationalize the code to that effect. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190412113830.4126-9-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7b4f15ff7
commit
14f1cfd4f7
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -1859,7 +1859,6 @@ static int intel_pt_sync_switch(struct intel_pt *pt, int cpu, pid_t tid,
|
|||
|
||||
switch (ptq->switch_state) {
|
||||
case INTEL_PT_SS_NOT_TRACING:
|
||||
ptq->next_tid = -1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case INTEL_PT_SS_UNKNOWN:
|
||||
case INTEL_PT_SS_TRACING:
|
||||
|
@ -1879,13 +1878,14 @@ static int intel_pt_sync_switch(struct intel_pt *pt, int cpu, pid_t tid,
|
|||
ptq->switch_state = INTEL_PT_SS_TRACING;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case INTEL_PT_SS_EXPECTING_SWITCH_IP:
|
||||
ptq->next_tid = tid;
|
||||
intel_pt_log("ERROR: cpu %d expecting switch ip\n", cpu);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ptq->next_tid = -1;
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue