xen-blkfront: Fix handling of non-supported operations
This patch fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:916:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:916:45: expected restricted blk_status_t [usertype] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:916:45: got int [signed] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1599:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1599:47: expected int [signed] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1599:47: got restricted blk_status_t [usertype] <noident>
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1607:55: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1607:55: expected int [signed] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1607:55: got restricted blk_status_t [usertype] <noident>
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1625:55: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1625:55: expected int [signed] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1625:55: got restricted blk_status_t [usertype] <noident>
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1628:62: warning: restricted blk_status_t degrades to integer
Compile-tested only.
Fixes: commit 2a842acab1
("block: introduce new block status code type")
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a7ee8cf190
commit
31c4ccc3ec
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct blk_shadow {
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
struct blkif_req {
|
struct blkif_req {
|
||||||
int error;
|
blk_status_t error;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static inline struct blkif_req *blkif_req(struct request *rq)
|
static inline struct blkif_req *blkif_req(struct request *rq)
|
||||||
|
@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
|
||||||
if (unlikely(bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_EOPNOTSUPP)) {
|
if (unlikely(bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_EOPNOTSUPP)) {
|
||||||
printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: %s op failed\n",
|
printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: %s op failed\n",
|
||||||
info->gd->disk_name, op_name(bret->operation));
|
info->gd->disk_name, op_name(bret->operation));
|
||||||
blkif_req(req)->error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
blkif_req(req)->error = BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (unlikely(bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_ERROR &&
|
if (unlikely(bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_ERROR &&
|
||||||
rinfo->shadow[id].req.u.rw.nr_segments == 0)) {
|
rinfo->shadow[id].req.u.rw.nr_segments == 0)) {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue