cpuidle: Menu governor fix wrong usage of measured_us
There is a bug in menu governor where we have if (data->elapsed_us < data->elapsed_us + measured_us) with measured_us already having elapsed_us added in tickless case here unsigned int measured_us = cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev) + data->elapsed_us; Also, it should be last_residency, not measured_us, that need to be used to do comparing and distinguish between expected & non-expected events. Refactor menu_reflect() to fix these two problems. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2bd920233
commit
320eee7763
1 changed files with 19 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
|
||||
int last_idx = data->last_state_idx;
|
||||
unsigned int measured_us =
|
||||
cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev) + data->elapsed_us;
|
||||
unsigned int last_idle_us = cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev);
|
||||
struct cpuidle_state *target = &dev->states[last_idx];
|
||||
unsigned int measured_us;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ugh, this idle state doesn't support residency measurements, so we
|
||||
|
@ -84,20 +84,27 @@ static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
|
|||
* for one full standard timer tick. However, be aware that this
|
||||
* could potentially result in a suboptimal state transition.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(target->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID))
|
||||
measured_us = USEC_PER_SEC / HZ;
|
||||
if (unlikely(!(target->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID)))
|
||||
last_idle_us = USEC_PER_SEC / HZ;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Predict time remaining until next break event */
|
||||
if (measured_us + BREAK_FUZZ < data->expected_us - target->exit_latency) {
|
||||
data->predicted_us = max(measured_us, data->last_measured_us);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* measured_us and elapsed_us are the cumulative idle time, since the
|
||||
* last time we were woken out of idle by an interrupt.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (data->elapsed_us <= data->elapsed_us + last_idle_us)
|
||||
measured_us = data->elapsed_us + last_idle_us;
|
||||
else
|
||||
measured_us = -1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Predict time until next break event */
|
||||
data->predicted_us = max(measured_us, data->last_measured_us);
|
||||
|
||||
if (last_idle_us + BREAK_FUZZ <
|
||||
data->expected_us - target->exit_latency) {
|
||||
data->last_measured_us = measured_us;
|
||||
data->elapsed_us = 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (data->elapsed_us < data->elapsed_us + measured_us)
|
||||
data->elapsed_us = measured_us;
|
||||
else
|
||||
data->elapsed_us = -1;
|
||||
data->predicted_us = max(measured_us, data->last_measured_us);
|
||||
data->elapsed_us = measured_us;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue