rcu: Update cpu_needs_another_gp() for futures from non-NOCB CPUs
In the old days, the only source of requests for future grace periods was NOCB CPUs. This has changed: CPUs routinely post requests for future grace periods in order to promote power efficiency and reduce OS jitter with minimal impact on grace-period latency. This commit therefore updates cpu_needs_another_gp() to invoke rcu_future_needs_gp() instead of rcu_nocb_needs_gp(). The latter is no longer used, so is now removed. This commit also adds tracing for the irq_work_queue() wakeup case. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
83ebe63ead
commit
365187fbc0
3 changed files with 29 additions and 29 deletions
|
@ -323,6 +323,28 @@ cpu_has_callbacks_ready_to_invoke(struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
|||
rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] != NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Return the root node of the specified rcu_state structure.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return &rsp->node[0];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Is there any need for future grace periods?
|
||||
* Interrupts must be disabled. If the caller does not hold the root
|
||||
* rnp_node structure's ->lock, the results are advisory only.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int rcu_future_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
int idx = (ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) + 1) & 0x1;
|
||||
int *fp = &rnp->need_future_gp[idx];
|
||||
|
||||
return ACCESS_ONCE(*fp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Does the current CPU require a not-yet-started grace period?
|
||||
* The caller must have disabled interrupts to prevent races with
|
||||
|
@ -335,7 +357,7 @@ cpu_needs_another_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
|||
|
||||
if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp))
|
||||
return 0; /* No, a grace period is already in progress. */
|
||||
if (rcu_nocb_needs_gp(rsp))
|
||||
if (rcu_future_needs_gp(rsp))
|
||||
return 1; /* Yes, a no-CBs CPU needs one. */
|
||||
if (!rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL])
|
||||
return 0; /* No, this is a no-CBs (or offline) CPU. */
|
||||
|
@ -349,14 +371,6 @@ cpu_needs_another_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
|||
return 0; /* No grace period needed. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Return the root node of the specified rcu_state structure.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return &rsp->node[0];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* rcu_eqs_enter_common - current CPU is moving towards extended quiescent state
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -1672,6 +1686,8 @@ static void rsp_wakeup(struct irq_work *work)
|
|||
|
||||
/* Wake up rcu_gp_kthread() to start the grace period. */
|
||||
wake_up(&rsp->gp_wq);
|
||||
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
|
||||
"Workqueuewoken");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -1706,8 +1722,11 @@ rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
|
|||
* the wakeup to interrupt context. And don't bother waking
|
||||
* up the running kthread.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (current != rsp->gp_kthread)
|
||||
if (current != rsp->gp_kthread) {
|
||||
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
|
||||
"Workqueuewake");
|
||||
irq_work_queue(&rsp->wakeup_work);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ static void print_cpu_stall_info(struct rcu_state *rsp, int cpu);
|
|||
static void print_cpu_stall_info_end(void);
|
||||
static void zero_cpu_stall_ticks(struct rcu_data *rdp);
|
||||
static void increment_cpu_stall_ticks(void);
|
||||
static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp);
|
||||
static void rcu_nocb_gp_set(struct rcu_node *rnp, int nrq);
|
||||
static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp);
|
||||
static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2067,19 +2067,6 @@ static int __init parse_rcu_nocb_poll(char *arg)
|
|||
}
|
||||
early_param("rcu_nocb_poll", parse_rcu_nocb_poll);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Do any no-CBs CPUs need another grace period?
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Interrupts must be disabled. If the caller does not hold the root
|
||||
* rnp_node structure's ->lock, the results are advisory only.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
|
||||
return rnp->need_future_gp[(ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) + 1) & 0x1];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Wake up any no-CBs CPUs' kthreads that were waiting on the just-ended
|
||||
* grace period.
|
||||
|
@ -2402,11 +2389,6 @@ static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
|||
|
||||
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
|
||||
|
||||
static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue