[AVR32] Fix atomic_add_unless() and atomic_sub_unless()
These functions depend on "result" being initalized to 0, but "result" is not included as an input constraint to the inline assembly block following its initialization, only as an output constraint. Thus gcc thinks it doesn't need to initialize it, so result ends up undefined if the "unless" condition is true. This fixes an oops in sunrpc where the faulty atomics caused rpciod_up() to not start the workqueue as it should. Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3e26984f1
commit
3da86ee4f1
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline int atomic_sub_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
|
|||
" mov %1, 1\n"
|
||||
"1:"
|
||||
: "=&r"(tmp), "=&r"(result), "=o"(v->counter)
|
||||
: "m"(v->counter), "rKs21"(a), "rKs21"(u)
|
||||
: "m"(v->counter), "rKs21"(a), "rKs21"(u), "1"(result)
|
||||
: "cc", "memory");
|
||||
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
|
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static inline int atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
|
|||
" mov %1, 1\n"
|
||||
"1:"
|
||||
: "=&r"(tmp), "=&r"(result), "=o"(v->counter)
|
||||
: "m"(v->counter), "r"(a), "ir"(u)
|
||||
: "m"(v->counter), "r"(a), "ir"(u), "1"(result)
|
||||
: "cc", "memory");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue