[PATCH] Improve CD/DVD packet driver write performance
This patch improves write performance for the CD/DVD packet writing driver. The logic for switching between reading and writing has been changed so that streaming writes are no longer interrupted by read requests. Signed-off-by: Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dfb388bf8a
commit
46c271bedd
2 changed files with 21 additions and 17 deletions
|
@ -467,14 +467,12 @@ static int pkt_set_speed(struct pktcdvd_device *pd, unsigned write_speed, unsign
|
|||
* Queue a bio for processing by the low-level CD device. Must be called
|
||||
* from process context.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void pkt_queue_bio(struct pktcdvd_device *pd, struct bio *bio, int high_prio_read)
|
||||
static void pkt_queue_bio(struct pktcdvd_device *pd, struct bio *bio)
|
||||
{
|
||||
spin_lock(&pd->iosched.lock);
|
||||
if (bio_data_dir(bio) == READ) {
|
||||
pkt_add_list_last(bio, &pd->iosched.read_queue,
|
||||
&pd->iosched.read_queue_tail);
|
||||
if (high_prio_read)
|
||||
pd->iosched.high_prio_read = 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
pkt_add_list_last(bio, &pd->iosched.write_queue,
|
||||
&pd->iosched.write_queue_tail);
|
||||
|
@ -490,15 +488,16 @@ static void pkt_queue_bio(struct pktcdvd_device *pd, struct bio *bio, int high_p
|
|||
* requirements for CDRW drives:
|
||||
* - A cache flush command must be inserted before a read request if the
|
||||
* previous request was a write.
|
||||
* - Switching between reading and writing is slow, so don't it more often
|
||||
* - Switching between reading and writing is slow, so don't do it more often
|
||||
* than necessary.
|
||||
* - Optimize for throughput at the expense of latency. This means that streaming
|
||||
* writes will never be interrupted by a read, but if the drive has to seek
|
||||
* before the next write, switch to reading instead if there are any pending
|
||||
* read requests.
|
||||
* - Set the read speed according to current usage pattern. When only reading
|
||||
* from the device, it's best to use the highest possible read speed, but
|
||||
* when switching often between reading and writing, it's better to have the
|
||||
* same read and write speeds.
|
||||
* - Reads originating from user space should have higher priority than reads
|
||||
* originating from pkt_gather_data, because some process is usually waiting
|
||||
* on reads of the first kind.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void pkt_iosched_process_queue(struct pktcdvd_device *pd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -512,21 +511,24 @@ static void pkt_iosched_process_queue(struct pktcdvd_device *pd)
|
|||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
struct bio *bio;
|
||||
int reads_queued, writes_queued, high_prio_read;
|
||||
int reads_queued, writes_queued;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&pd->iosched.lock);
|
||||
reads_queued = (pd->iosched.read_queue != NULL);
|
||||
writes_queued = (pd->iosched.write_queue != NULL);
|
||||
if (!reads_queued)
|
||||
pd->iosched.high_prio_read = 0;
|
||||
high_prio_read = pd->iosched.high_prio_read;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&pd->iosched.lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!reads_queued && !writes_queued)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
if (pd->iosched.writing) {
|
||||
if (high_prio_read || (!writes_queued && reads_queued)) {
|
||||
int need_write_seek = 1;
|
||||
spin_lock(&pd->iosched.lock);
|
||||
bio = pd->iosched.write_queue;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&pd->iosched.lock);
|
||||
if (bio && (bio->bi_sector == pd->iosched.last_write))
|
||||
need_write_seek = 0;
|
||||
if (need_write_seek && reads_queued) {
|
||||
if (atomic_read(&pd->cdrw.pending_bios) > 0) {
|
||||
VPRINTK("pktcdvd: write, waiting\n");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -559,8 +561,10 @@ static void pkt_iosched_process_queue(struct pktcdvd_device *pd)
|
|||
|
||||
if (bio_data_dir(bio) == READ)
|
||||
pd->iosched.successive_reads += bio->bi_size >> 10;
|
||||
else
|
||||
else {
|
||||
pd->iosched.successive_reads = 0;
|
||||
pd->iosched.last_write = bio->bi_sector + bio_sectors(bio);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (pd->iosched.successive_reads >= HI_SPEED_SWITCH) {
|
||||
if (pd->read_speed == pd->write_speed) {
|
||||
pd->read_speed = MAX_SPEED;
|
||||
|
@ -765,7 +769,7 @@ static void pkt_gather_data(struct pktcdvd_device *pd, struct packet_data *pkt)
|
|||
|
||||
atomic_inc(&pkt->io_wait);
|
||||
bio->bi_rw = READ;
|
||||
pkt_queue_bio(pd, bio, 0);
|
||||
pkt_queue_bio(pd, bio);
|
||||
frames_read++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1062,7 +1066,7 @@ static void pkt_start_write(struct pktcdvd_device *pd, struct packet_data *pkt)
|
|||
|
||||
atomic_set(&pkt->io_wait, 1);
|
||||
pkt->w_bio->bi_rw = WRITE;
|
||||
pkt_queue_bio(pd, pkt->w_bio, 0);
|
||||
pkt_queue_bio(pd, pkt->w_bio);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void pkt_finish_packet(struct packet_data *pkt, int uptodate)
|
||||
|
@ -2120,7 +2124,7 @@ static int pkt_make_request(request_queue_t *q, struct bio *bio)
|
|||
cloned_bio->bi_private = psd;
|
||||
cloned_bio->bi_end_io = pkt_end_io_read_cloned;
|
||||
pd->stats.secs_r += bio->bi_size >> 9;
|
||||
pkt_queue_bio(pd, cloned_bio, 1);
|
||||
pkt_queue_bio(pd, cloned_bio);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ struct packet_iosched
|
|||
struct bio *read_queue_tail;
|
||||
struct bio *write_queue;
|
||||
struct bio *write_queue_tail;
|
||||
int high_prio_read; /* An important read request has been queued */
|
||||
sector_t last_write; /* The sector where the last write ended */
|
||||
int successive_reads;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue