capabilities: intuitive names for cap gain status
Introduce macros cap_gained, cap_grew, cap_full to make the use of the negation of is_subset() easier to read and analyse. Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Acked-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Okay-ished-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
db1a8922cf
commit
4c7e715fc8
1 changed files with 11 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -741,6 +741,12 @@ static void handle_privileged_root(struct linux_binprm *bprm, bool has_cap,
|
|||
*effective = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define __cap_gained(field, target, source) \
|
||||
!cap_issubset(target->cap_##field, source->cap_##field)
|
||||
#define __cap_grew(target, source, cred) \
|
||||
!cap_issubset(cred->cap_##target, cred->cap_##source)
|
||||
#define __cap_full(field, cred) \
|
||||
cap_issubset(CAP_FULL_SET, cred->cap_##field)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* cap_bprm_set_creds - Set up the proposed credentials for execve().
|
||||
* @bprm: The execution parameters, including the proposed creds
|
||||
|
@ -769,10 +775,9 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
|
|||
handle_privileged_root(bprm, has_cap, &effective, root_uid);
|
||||
|
||||
/* if we have fs caps, clear dangerous personality flags */
|
||||
if (!cap_issubset(new->cap_permitted, old->cap_permitted))
|
||||
if (__cap_gained(permitted, new, old))
|
||||
bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* Don't let someone trace a set[ug]id/setpcap binary with the revised
|
||||
* credentials unless they have the appropriate permit.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -780,8 +785,7 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
is_setid = !uid_eq(new->euid, old->uid) || !gid_eq(new->egid, old->gid);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((is_setid ||
|
||||
!cap_issubset(new->cap_permitted, old->cap_permitted)) &&
|
||||
if ((is_setid || __cap_gained(permitted, new, old)) &&
|
||||
((bprm->unsafe & ~LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE) ||
|
||||
!ptracer_capable(current, new->user_ns))) {
|
||||
/* downgrade; they get no more than they had, and maybe less */
|
||||
|
@ -831,8 +835,8 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
|
|||
* Number 1 above might fail if you don't have a full bset, but I think
|
||||
* that is interesting information to audit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!cap_issubset(new->cap_effective, new->cap_ambient)) {
|
||||
if (!cap_issubset(CAP_FULL_SET, new->cap_effective) ||
|
||||
if (__cap_grew(effective, ambient, new)) {
|
||||
if (!__cap_full(effective, new) ||
|
||||
!uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid) || !uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid) ||
|
||||
issecure(SECURE_NOROOT)) {
|
||||
ret = audit_log_bprm_fcaps(bprm, new, old);
|
||||
|
@ -852,7 +856,7 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
|
|||
bprm->cap_elevated = 1;
|
||||
} else if (!uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid)) {
|
||||
if (effective ||
|
||||
!cap_issubset(new->cap_permitted, new->cap_ambient))
|
||||
__cap_grew(permitted, ambient, new))
|
||||
bprm->cap_elevated = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue