fix the treatment of jfs special inodes
We used to put them on a single list, without any locking. Racy. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d8e9650dff
commit
5b45d96bf9
1 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -58,9 +58,9 @@
|
|||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* __mark_inode_dirty expects inodes to be hashed. Since we don't want
|
||||
* special inodes in the fileset inode space, we hash them to a dummy head
|
||||
* special inodes in the fileset inode space, we make them appear hashed,
|
||||
* but do not put on any lists.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static HLIST_HEAD(aggregate_hash);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* imap locks
|
||||
|
@ -496,7 +496,11 @@ struct inode *diReadSpecial(struct super_block *sb, ino_t inum, int secondary)
|
|||
/* release the page */
|
||||
release_metapage(mp);
|
||||
|
||||
hlist_add_head(&ip->i_hash, &aggregate_hash);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* that will look hashed, but won't be on any list; hlist_del()
|
||||
* will work fine and require no locking.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ip->i_hash.pprev = &ip->i_hash.next;
|
||||
|
||||
return (ip);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue