bpp: bkl pushdown
Put explicit lock_kernel() calls into bpp_open(). It has locking, but I'm not convinced it won't race with ioctl(). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4541b5ec9f
commit
5e9829ad38
1 changed files with 3 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
|
||||||
#include <linux/timer.h>
|
#include <linux/timer.h>
|
||||||
#include <linux/ioport.h>
|
#include <linux/ioport.h>
|
||||||
#include <linux/major.h>
|
#include <linux/major.h>
|
||||||
|
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
|
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
|
||||||
#include <asm/io.h>
|
#include <asm/io.h>
|
||||||
|
@ -429,6 +430,7 @@ static int bpp_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
|
||||||
unsigned minor = iminor(inode);
|
unsigned minor = iminor(inode);
|
||||||
int ret;
|
int ret;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
lock_kernel();
|
||||||
spin_lock(&bpp_open_lock);
|
spin_lock(&bpp_open_lock);
|
||||||
ret = 0;
|
ret = 0;
|
||||||
if (minor >= BPP_NO) {
|
if (minor >= BPP_NO) {
|
||||||
|
@ -444,6 +446,7 @@ static int bpp_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&bpp_open_lock);
|
spin_unlock(&bpp_open_lock);
|
||||||
|
unlock_kernel();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return ret;
|
return ret;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue