x86 setup: fix asm constraints in vesa_store_edid
Impact: fix potential miscompile (currently believed non-manifest) As the comment explains, the VBE DDC call can clobber any register. Tell the compiler about that fact. Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
618b2c8db2
commit
7fc49f1981
1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -269,9 +269,8 @@ void vesa_store_edid(void)
|
|||
we genuinely have to assume all registers are destroyed here. */
|
||||
|
||||
asm("pushw %%es; movw %2,%%es; "INT10"; popw %%es"
|
||||
: "+a" (ax), "+b" (bx)
|
||||
: "c" (cx), "D" (di)
|
||||
: "esi");
|
||||
: "+a" (ax), "+b" (bx), "+c" (cx), "+D" (di)
|
||||
: : "esi", "edx");
|
||||
|
||||
if (ax != 0x004f)
|
||||
return; /* No EDID */
|
||||
|
@ -285,9 +284,9 @@ void vesa_store_edid(void)
|
|||
dx = 0; /* EDID block number */
|
||||
di =(size_t) &boot_params.edid_info; /* (ES:)Pointer to block */
|
||||
asm(INT10
|
||||
: "+a" (ax), "+b" (bx), "+d" (dx), "=m" (boot_params.edid_info)
|
||||
: "c" (cx), "D" (di)
|
||||
: "esi");
|
||||
: "+a" (ax), "+b" (bx), "+d" (dx), "=m" (boot_params.edid_info),
|
||||
"+c" (cx), "+D" (di)
|
||||
: : "esi");
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue