Btrfs: use 'u64' rather than 'int' to get extent's generation
We define a 'int' to get extent's generation by mistake,fix it. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9dced186f9
commit
7fdf4b608d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -3263,7 +3263,7 @@ static int add_tree_block(struct reloc_control *rc,
|
|||
struct rb_node *rb_node;
|
||||
u32 item_size;
|
||||
int level = -1;
|
||||
int generation;
|
||||
u64 generation;
|
||||
|
||||
eb = path->nodes[0];
|
||||
item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, path->slots[0]);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue