[PATCH] typo fixes for rt-mutex-design.txt
Address some simple typos in rt-mutex-design.txt It also changes the indentation of the cmpxchg example (the cmpxchg example was indented by spaces, while all other code snippets were indented by tabs). Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Jan Altenberg <tb10alj@tglx.de> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
710b8b5f43
commit
9ba0bdfd04
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -333,11 +333,11 @@ cmpxchg is basically the following function performed atomically:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
unsigned long _cmpxchg(unsigned long *A, unsigned long *B, unsigned long *C)
|
unsigned long _cmpxchg(unsigned long *A, unsigned long *B, unsigned long *C)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
unsigned long T = *A;
|
unsigned long T = *A;
|
||||||
if (*A == *B) {
|
if (*A == *B) {
|
||||||
*A = *C;
|
*A = *C;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return T;
|
return T;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
#define cmpxchg(a,b,c) _cmpxchg(&a,&b,&c)
|
#define cmpxchg(a,b,c) _cmpxchg(&a,&b,&c)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ contention).
|
||||||
try_to_take_rt_mutex is used every time the task tries to grab a mutex in the
|
try_to_take_rt_mutex is used every time the task tries to grab a mutex in the
|
||||||
slow path. The first thing that is done here is an atomic setting of
|
slow path. The first thing that is done here is an atomic setting of
|
||||||
the "Has Waiters" flag of the mutex's owner field. Yes, this could really
|
the "Has Waiters" flag of the mutex's owner field. Yes, this could really
|
||||||
be false, because if the the mutex has no owner, there are no waiters and
|
be false, because if the mutex has no owner, there are no waiters and
|
||||||
the current task also won't have any waiters. But we don't have the lock
|
the current task also won't have any waiters. But we don't have the lock
|
||||||
yet, so we assume we are going to be a waiter. The reason for this is to
|
yet, so we assume we are going to be a waiter. The reason for this is to
|
||||||
play nice for those architectures that do have CMPXCHG. By setting this flag
|
play nice for those architectures that do have CMPXCHG. By setting this flag
|
||||||
|
@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ do have CMPXCHG, that check is done in the fast path, but it is still needed
|
||||||
in the slow path too. If a waiter of a mutex woke up because of a signal
|
in the slow path too. If a waiter of a mutex woke up because of a signal
|
||||||
or timeout between the time the owner failed the fast path CMPXCHG check and
|
or timeout between the time the owner failed the fast path CMPXCHG check and
|
||||||
the grabbing of the wait_lock, the mutex may not have any waiters, thus the
|
the grabbing of the wait_lock, the mutex may not have any waiters, thus the
|
||||||
owner still needs to make this check. If there are no waiters than the mutex
|
owner still needs to make this check. If there are no waiters then the mutex
|
||||||
owner field is set to NULL, the wait_lock is released and nothing more is
|
owner field is set to NULL, the wait_lock is released and nothing more is
|
||||||
needed.
|
needed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue