resources: handle overflow when aligning start of available area
If tmp.start is near ~0, ALIGN(tmp.start) may overflow, which would make us think there's more available space than there really is. We would likely return something that conflicts with a previous resource, which would cause a failure when allocate_resource() requests the newly- allocated region. Reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646027 Reported-by: Fabrice Bellet <fabrice@bellet.info> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6909ba14c2
commit
a1862e3107
1 changed files with 13 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int find_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
|
|||
void *alignf_data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct resource *this = root->child;
|
||||
struct resource tmp = *new, alloc;
|
||||
struct resource tmp = *new, avail, alloc;
|
||||
|
||||
tmp.start = root->start;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -410,14 +410,19 @@ static int find_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
|
|||
tmp.end = root->end;
|
||||
|
||||
resource_clip(&tmp, min, max);
|
||||
tmp.start = ALIGN(tmp.start, align);
|
||||
|
||||
alloc.start = alignf(alignf_data, &tmp, size, align);
|
||||
alloc.end = alloc.start + size - 1;
|
||||
if (resource_contains(&tmp, &alloc)) {
|
||||
new->start = alloc.start;
|
||||
new->end = alloc.end;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
/* Check for overflow after ALIGN() */
|
||||
avail = *new;
|
||||
avail.start = ALIGN(tmp.start, align);
|
||||
avail.end = tmp.end;
|
||||
if (avail.start >= tmp.start) {
|
||||
alloc.start = alignf(alignf_data, &avail, size, align);
|
||||
alloc.end = alloc.start + size - 1;
|
||||
if (resource_contains(&avail, &alloc)) {
|
||||
new->start = alloc.start;
|
||||
new->end = alloc.end;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!this)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue