btrfs: tree-checker: Verify dev item
[BUG] For fuzzed image whose DEV_ITEM has invalid total_bytes as 0, then kernel will just panic: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000098 #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] PGD 800000022b2bd067 P4D 800000022b2bd067 PUD 22b2bc067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 1106 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #9 RIP: 0010:btrfs_verify_dev_extents+0x2a5/0x5a0 Call Trace: open_ctree+0x160d/0x2149 btrfs_mount_root+0x5b2/0x680 [CAUSE] If device extent verification finds a deivce with 0 total_bytes, then it assumes it's a seed dummy, then search for seed devices. But in this case, there is no seed device at all, causing NULL pointer. [FIX] Since this is caused by fuzzed image, let's go the tree-check way, just add a new verification for device item. Reported-by: Yoon Jungyeon <jungyeon@gatech.edu> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202691 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
075cb3c78f
commit
ab4ba2e133
3 changed files with 83 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -600,6 +600,77 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__printf(4, 5)
|
||||
__cold
|
||||
static void dev_item_err(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
const struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
|
||||
const char *fmt, ...)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct btrfs_key key;
|
||||
struct va_format vaf;
|
||||
va_list args;
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, slot);
|
||||
va_start(args, fmt);
|
||||
|
||||
vaf.fmt = fmt;
|
||||
vaf.va = &args;
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_crit(fs_info,
|
||||
"corrupt %s: root=%llu block=%llu slot=%d devid=%llu %pV",
|
||||
btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0 ? "leaf" : "node",
|
||||
btrfs_header_owner(eb), btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), slot,
|
||||
key.objectid, &vaf);
|
||||
va_end(args);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int check_dev_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
struct extent_buffer *leaf,
|
||||
struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct btrfs_dev_item *ditem;
|
||||
u64 max_devid = max(BTRFS_MAX_DEVS(fs_info), BTRFS_MAX_DEVS_SYS_CHUNK);
|
||||
|
||||
if (key->objectid != BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID) {
|
||||
dev_item_err(fs_info, leaf, slot,
|
||||
"invalid objectid: has=%llu expect=%llu",
|
||||
key->objectid, BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID);
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (key->offset > max_devid) {
|
||||
dev_item_err(fs_info, leaf, slot,
|
||||
"invalid devid: has=%llu expect=[0, %llu]",
|
||||
key->offset, max_devid);
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ditem = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dev_item);
|
||||
if (btrfs_device_id(leaf, ditem) != key->offset) {
|
||||
dev_item_err(fs_info, leaf, slot,
|
||||
"devid mismatch: key has=%llu item has=%llu",
|
||||
key->offset, btrfs_device_id(leaf, ditem));
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For device total_bytes, we don't have reliable way to check it, as
|
||||
* it can be 0 for device removal. Device size check can only be done
|
||||
* by dev extents check.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (btrfs_device_bytes_used(leaf, ditem) >
|
||||
btrfs_device_total_bytes(leaf, ditem)) {
|
||||
dev_item_err(fs_info, leaf, slot,
|
||||
"invalid bytes used: have %llu expect [0, %llu]",
|
||||
btrfs_device_bytes_used(leaf, ditem),
|
||||
btrfs_device_total_bytes(leaf, ditem));
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Remaining members like io_align/type/gen/dev_group aren't really
|
||||
* utilized. Skip them to make later usage of them easier.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Common point to switch the item-specific validation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -630,6 +701,9 @@ static int check_leaf_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
ret = btrfs_check_chunk_valid(fs_info, leaf, chunk,
|
||||
key->offset);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY:
|
||||
ret = check_dev_item(fs_info, leaf, key, slot);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4958,15 +4958,6 @@ static void check_raid56_incompat_flag(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 type)
|
|||
btrfs_set_fs_incompat(info, RAID56);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_MAX_DEVS(info) ((BTRFS_MAX_ITEM_SIZE(info) \
|
||||
- sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk)) \
|
||||
/ sizeof(struct btrfs_stripe) + 1)
|
||||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_MAX_DEVS_SYS_CHUNK ((BTRFS_SYSTEM_CHUNK_ARRAY_SIZE \
|
||||
- 2 * sizeof(struct btrfs_disk_key) \
|
||||
- 2 * sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk)) \
|
||||
/ sizeof(struct btrfs_stripe) + 1)
|
||||
|
||||
static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
||||
u64 start, u64 type)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -258,6 +258,15 @@ struct btrfs_fs_devices {
|
|||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BIO_INLINE_CSUM_SIZE 64
|
||||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_MAX_DEVS(info) ((BTRFS_MAX_ITEM_SIZE(info) \
|
||||
- sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk)) \
|
||||
/ sizeof(struct btrfs_stripe) + 1)
|
||||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_MAX_DEVS_SYS_CHUNK ((BTRFS_SYSTEM_CHUNK_ARRAY_SIZE \
|
||||
- 2 * sizeof(struct btrfs_disk_key) \
|
||||
- 2 * sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk)) \
|
||||
/ sizeof(struct btrfs_stripe) + 1)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* we need the mirror number and stripe index to be passed around
|
||||
* the call chain while we are processing end_io (especially errors).
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue