kpriv/linux-hardened
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

task_work: Make task_work_add() lockless

Browse source 
Change task_work's to use llist-like code to avoid pi_lock
in task_work_add(), this makes it useable under rq->lock.

task_work_cancel() and task_work_run() still use pi_lock
to synchronize with each other.

(This is in preparation for a deadlock fix.)

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120826191209.GA4221@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Oleg Nesterov 2012-08-26 21:12:09 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 15674868d6
commit ac3d0da8f3
1 changed files with 48 additions and 47 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

95
kernel/task_work.c
View file

@ -3,25 +3,18 @@
#include <linux/tracehook.h>
int
task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *twork, bool notify)
task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work, bool notify)
{
struct callback_head *last, *first;
unsigned long flags;
struct callback_head *head;
/*
* Not inserting the new work if the task has already passed
* exit_task_work() is the responisbility of callers.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
last = task->task_works;
first = last ? last->next : twork;
twork->next = first;
if (last)
last->next = twork;
task->task_works = twork;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
do {
head = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works);
work->next = head;
} while (cmpxchg(&task->task_works, head, work) != head);
/* test_and_set_bit() implies mb(), see tracehook_notify_resume(). */
if (notify)
set_notify_resume(task);
return 0;
@ -30,52 +23,60 @@ task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *twork, bool notify
struct callback_head *
task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
{
struct callback_head **pprev = &task->task_works;
struct callback_head *work = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
struct callback_head *last, *res = NULL;
/*
* If cmpxchg() fails we continue without updating pprev.
* Either we raced with task_work_add() which added the
* new entry before this work, we will find it again. Or
* we raced with task_work_run(), *pprev == NULL.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
last = task->task_works;
if (last) {
struct callback_head *q = last, *p = q->next;
while (1) {
if (p->func == func) {
q->next = p->next;
if (p == last)
task->task_works = q == p ? NULL : q;
res = p;
break;
}
if (p == last)
break;
q = p;
p = q->next;
}
while ((work = ACCESS_ONCE(*pprev))) {
read_barrier_depends();
if (work->func != func)
pprev = &work->next;
else if (cmpxchg(pprev, work, work->next) == work)
break;
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
return res;
return work;
}
void task_work_run(void)
{
struct task_struct *task = current;
struct callback_head *p, *q;
struct callback_head *work, *head, *next;
while (1) {
raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
p = task->task_works;
task->task_works = NULL;
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
for (;;) {
work = xchg(&task->task_works, NULL);
if (!work)
break;
/*
* Synchronize with task_work_cancel(). It can't remove
* the first entry == work, cmpxchg(task_works) should
* fail, but it can play with *work and other entries.
*/
raw_spin_unlock_wait(&task->pi_lock);
smp_mb();
if (unlikely(!p))
return;
/* Reverse the list to run the works in fifo order */
head = NULL;
do {
next = work->next;
work->next = head;
head = work;
work = next;
} while (work);
q = p->next; /* head */
p->next = NULL; /* cut it */
while (q) {
p = q->next;
q->func(q);
q = p;
work = head;
do {
next = work->next;
work->func(work);
work = next;
cond_resched();
}
} while (work);
}
}