cifs: small variable name cleanup
server and ses->server are the same, but it's a little bit ugly that we lock &ses->server->srv_mutex and unlock &server->srv_mutex. It causes a false positive in Smatch about inconsistent locking. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
efb79f289f
commit
b13ce4bbca
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -3836,7 +3836,7 @@ cifs_setup_session(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses,
|
|||
if (rc) {
|
||||
cifs_dbg(VFS, "Send error in SessSetup = %d\n", rc);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ses->server->srv_mutex);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&server->srv_mutex);
|
||||
if (!server->session_estab) {
|
||||
server->session_key.response = ses->auth_key.response;
|
||||
server->session_key.len = ses->auth_key.len;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue