thermal: cpu_cooling: Don't check is_cpufreq_valid()
Because get_cpu_frequency() has returned a valid frequency, it means that the cpufreq policy is surely valid and so no point checking that again with is_cpufreq_valid(). Get rid of the routine as well as there are no more users. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1fae554fb
commit
c9ca319f05
1 changed files with 1 additions and 19 deletions
|
@ -110,23 +110,6 @@ static void release_idr(struct idr *idr, int id)
|
|||
|
||||
/* Below code defines functions to be used for cpufreq as cooling device */
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* is_cpufreq_valid - function to check frequency transitioning capability.
|
||||
* @cpu: cpu for which check is needed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This function will check the current state of the system if
|
||||
* it is capable of changing the frequency for a given @cpu.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Return: 0 if the system is not currently capable of changing
|
||||
* the frequency of given cpu. !0 in case the frequency is changeable.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int is_cpufreq_valid(int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
|
||||
|
||||
return !cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
enum cpufreq_cooling_property {
|
||||
GET_LEVEL,
|
||||
GET_FREQ,
|
||||
|
@ -300,8 +283,7 @@ static int cpufreq_apply_cooling(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_device,
|
|||
cpufreq_device->cpufreq_state = cooling_state;
|
||||
cpufreq_device->cpufreq_val = clip_freq;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_cpufreq_valid(cpu))
|
||||
cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
|
||||
cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue