net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: hwtstamp: remove unnecessary range checking tests
_port_ is already known to be a valid index in the callers [1]. So these checks are unnecessary. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/16/469 Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465287 Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465291 Suggested-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e3f9f41757
commit
e21fed5864
1 changed files with 0 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -179,9 +179,6 @@ int mv88e6xxx_port_hwtstamp_set(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
|
|||
if (!chip->info->ptp_support)
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
|
||||
if (port < 0 || port >= mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (copy_from_user(&config, ifr->ifr_data, sizeof(config)))
|
||||
return -EFAULT;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -206,9 +203,6 @@ int mv88e6xxx_port_hwtstamp_get(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
|
|||
if (!chip->info->ptp_support)
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
|
||||
if (port < 0 || port >= mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
return copy_to_user(ifr->ifr_data, config, sizeof(*config)) ?
|
||||
-EFAULT : 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -255,9 +249,6 @@ static u8 *mv88e6xxx_should_tstamp(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
|
|||
if (!chip->info->ptp_support)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (port < 0 || port >= mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
hdr = parse_ptp_header(skb, type);
|
||||
if (!hdr)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue