From e62869be1ed7569bf12a5dc28c5b7ee5823f9cf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anand Jain Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:29:28 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: balance: use term redundancy instead of integrity in message When balance reduces the number of copies of metadata, it reduces the redundancy, use the term redundancy instead of integrity. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index d8d7b1ee83ca..8d1555be03ad 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4036,7 +4036,7 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int ret; u64 num_devices; unsigned seq; - bool reducing_integrity; + bool reducing_redundancy; int i; if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info) || @@ -4119,9 +4119,9 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, ((bctl->meta.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) && (fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits & allowed) && !(bctl->meta.target & allowed))) - reducing_integrity = true; + reducing_redundancy = true; else - reducing_integrity = false; + reducing_redundancy = false; /* if we're not converting, the target field is uninitialized */ meta_target = (bctl->meta.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) ? @@ -4130,13 +4130,13 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, bctl->data.target : fs_info->avail_data_alloc_bits; } while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq)); - if (reducing_integrity) { + if (reducing_redundancy) { if (bctl->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_FORCE) { btrfs_info(fs_info, - "balance: force reducing metadata integrity"); + "balance: force reducing metadata redundancy"); } else { btrfs_err(fs_info, - "balance: reduces metadata integrity, use --force if you want this"); + "balance: reduces metadata redundancy, use --force if you want this"); ret = -EINVAL; goto out; }