virtio_console: avoid config access from irq

when multiport is off, virtio console invokes config access from irq
context, config access is blocking on s390.
Fix this up by scheduling work from config irq - similar to what we do
for multiport configs.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
Michael S. Tsirkin 2015-03-05 10:45:49 +10:30 committed by Rusty Russell
parent 4f6e24ed9d
commit eeb8a7e8bb

View file

@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ struct ports_device {
* notification
*/
struct work_struct control_work;
struct work_struct config_work;
struct list_head ports;
@ -1837,10 +1838,21 @@ static void config_intr(struct virtio_device *vdev)
portdev = vdev->priv;
if (!use_multiport(portdev))
schedule_work(&portdev->config_work);
}
static void config_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct ports_device *portdev;
portdev = container_of(work, struct ports_device, control_work);
if (!use_multiport(portdev)) {
struct virtio_device *vdev;
struct port *port;
u16 rows, cols;
vdev = portdev->vdev;
virtio_cread(vdev, struct virtio_console_config, cols, &cols);
virtio_cread(vdev, struct virtio_console_config, rows, &rows);
@ -2040,6 +2052,7 @@ static int virtcons_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
INIT_WORK(&portdev->config_work, &config_work_handler);
INIT_WORK(&portdev->control_work, &control_work_handler);
if (multiport) {
@ -2114,6 +2127,8 @@ static void virtcons_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
/* Finish up work that's lined up */
if (use_multiport(portdev))
cancel_work_sync(&portdev->control_work);
else
cancel_work_sync(&portdev->config_work);
list_for_each_entry_safe(port, port2, &portdev->ports, list)
unplug_port(port);
@ -2165,6 +2180,7 @@ static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
virtqueue_disable_cb(portdev->c_ivq);
cancel_work_sync(&portdev->control_work);
cancel_work_sync(&portdev->config_work);
/*
* Once more: if control_work_handler() was running, it would
* enable the cb as the last step.