mm/swap_slots.c: don't disable preemption while taking the per-CPU cache
get_cpu_var() disables preemption and returns the per-CPU version of the variable. Disabling preemption is useful to ensure atomic access to the variable within the critical section. In this case however, after the per-CPU version of the variable is obtained the ->free_lock is acquired. For that reason it seems the raw accessor could be used. It only seems that ->slots_ret should be retested (because with disabled preemption this variable can not be set to NULL otherwise). This popped up during PREEMPT-RT testing because it tries to take spinlocks in a preempt disabled section. In RT, spinlocks can sleep. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170623114755.2ebxdysacvgxzott@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ying Huang <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b002529d25
commit
f07e0f849a
1 changed files with 2 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -273,11 +273,11 @@ int free_swap_slot(swp_entry_t entry)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct swap_slots_cache *cache;
|
||||
|
||||
cache = &get_cpu_var(swp_slots);
|
||||
cache = raw_cpu_ptr(&swp_slots);
|
||||
if (use_swap_slot_cache && cache->slots_ret) {
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&cache->free_lock);
|
||||
/* Swap slots cache may be deactivated before acquiring lock */
|
||||
if (!use_swap_slot_cache) {
|
||||
if (!use_swap_slot_cache || !cache->slots_ret) {
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&cache->free_lock);
|
||||
goto direct_free;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ int free_swap_slot(swp_entry_t entry)
|
|||
direct_free:
|
||||
swapcache_free_entries(&entry, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
put_cpu_var(swp_slots);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue