powerpc/mm: Fix typo in PTRS_PER_PUD
PTRS_PER_PUD should be based on PUD_INDEX_SIZE, not PMD_INDEX_SIZE. We got away with it because PUD and PMD had the same index size, but this is no longer true with Aneesh's patchset to support a 46-bit user effective address space. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b92a66a65c
commit
f3d3444572
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#define PTRS_PER_PTE (1 << PTE_INDEX_SIZE)
|
||||
#define PTRS_PER_PMD (1 << PMD_INDEX_SIZE)
|
||||
#define PTRS_PER_PUD (1 << PMD_INDEX_SIZE)
|
||||
#define PTRS_PER_PUD (1 << PUD_INDEX_SIZE)
|
||||
#define PTRS_PER_PGD (1 << PGD_INDEX_SIZE)
|
||||
|
||||
/* PMD_SHIFT determines what a second-level page table entry can map */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue