ACPI: processor_perflib: Simplify code and stop using CPUFREQ_START
acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() can live without using CPUFREQ_START (which is gonna be removed soon), as it is only used while setting ignore_ppc to 0. This can be done with the help of "ignore_ppc < 0" check alone. The notifier function anyway ignores all events except CPUFREQ_ADJUST and dropping CPUFREQ_START wouldn't harm at all. Once CPUFREQ_START event is removed from the cpufreq core, acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() will get called only for CPUFREQ_NOTIFY or CPUFREQ_ADJUST event. Drop the return statement from the first if block to make sure we don't ignore any such events. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b12f7a2b01
commit
fa29ae5f22
1 changed files with 1 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -75,10 +75,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
|
||||||
struct acpi_processor *pr;
|
struct acpi_processor *pr;
|
||||||
unsigned int ppc = 0;
|
unsigned int ppc = 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (event == CPUFREQ_START && ignore_ppc <= 0) {
|
if (ignore_ppc < 0)
|
||||||
ignore_ppc = 0;
|
ignore_ppc = 0;
|
||||||
return 0;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (ignore_ppc)
|
if (ignore_ppc)
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue