The filesystem turns readonly instead of returning the error to the
caller when detected error in btrfs_drop_snapshot().
and, because the caller doesn't check the error, the function type is
changed to 'void'.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When checking if there is enough space for balancing a block group,
since we do not take raid types into consideration, we do not account
corrent amounts of space that we needed. This makes us do some extra
work before we get ENOSPC.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When balancing, we'll first try to shrink devices for some space,
but if it is working on a full multi-disk partition with raid protection,
we may encounter a bug, that is, while shrinking, total_bytes may be less
than bytes_used, and btrfs may allocate a dev extent that accesses out of
device's bounds.
Then we will not be able to write or read the data which stores at the end
of the device, and get the followings:
device fsid 0939f071-7ea3-46c8-95df-f176d773bfb6 devid 1 transid 10 /dev/sdb5
Btrfs detected SSD devices, enabling SSD mode
btrfs: relocating block group 476315648 flags 9
btrfs: found 4 extents
attempt to access beyond end of device
sdb5: rw=145, want=546176, limit=546147
attempt to access beyond end of device
sdb5: rw=145, want=546304, limit=546147
attempt to access beyond end of device
sdb5: rw=145, want=546432, limit=546147
attempt to access beyond end of device
sdb5: rw=145, want=546560, limit=546147
attempt to access beyond end of device
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When btrfs recovers from a crash, it may hit the oops below:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:4580!
[...]
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03df251>] [<ffffffffa03df251>] btrfs_add_link+0x161/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[...]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa03e7b31>] ? btrfs_inode_ref_index+0x31/0x80 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04054e9>] add_inode_ref+0x319/0x3f0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0407087>] replay_one_buffer+0x2c7/0x390 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa040444a>] walk_down_log_tree+0x32a/0x480 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0404695>] walk_log_tree+0xf5/0x240 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0406cc0>] btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x250/0x350 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0406dc0>] ? btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x350/0x350 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa03d18b2>] open_ctree+0x1442/0x17d0 [btrfs]
[...]
This comes from that while replaying an inode ref item, we forget to
check those old conflicting DIR_ITEM and DIR_INDEX items in fs/file tree,
then we will come to conflict corners which lead to BUG_ON().
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
We have a problem where if a user specifies discard but doesn't actually support
it we will return EOPNOTSUPP from btrfs_discard_extent. This is a problem
because this gets called (in a fashion) from the tree log recovery code, which
has a nice little BUG_ON(ret) after it, which causes us to fail the tree log
replay. So instead detect wether our devices support discard when we're adding
them and then don't issue discards if we know that the device doesn't support
it. And just for good measure set ret = 0 in btrfs_issue_discard just in case
we still get EOPNOTSUPP so we don't screw anybody up like this again. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Btrfs does bio submissions from a worker thread, and each device
has a list of high priority bios and regular priority bios.
Synchronous writes go to the high priority thread while async writes
go to regular list. This commit brings back an explicit unplug
any time we switch from high to regular priority, which makes it
easier for the block layer to give us low latencies.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When doing a writepage we call writepages to try and write out any other dirty
pages in the area. This could cause problems where we commit a transaction and
then have somebody else dirtying metadata in the area as we could end up writing
out a lot more than we care about, which could cause latency on anybody who is
waiting for the transaction to completely finish committing. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The variable 'last_index' is calculated in the __btrfs_buffered_write
function and passed as a parameter to the prepare_pages function,
but is not used anywhere in the prepare_pages function.
Remove instances of 'last_index' in these functions.
Signed-off-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
find_first_extent_bit() and find_first_extent_bit_state() share
most of the code, and we can just make the former call the latter.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
We can just use cond_resched_lock().
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
These members are not used at all.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
unpin_extent_cache() and add_extent_mapping() shares the same code
that merges extent maps.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
lookup_extent_map() and search_extent_map() can share most of code.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
rb_node returned by __tree_search() can be a valid pointer or NULL,
but won't be some errno.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When we search a dir item with a specific hash code, we can
just return NULL without further checking if btrfs_search_slot()
returns 1.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Since commit f2a97a9dbd
("btrfs: remove all unused functions"), there's no extern functions
at all in ref-cache.c, so just remove the remaining dead code.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Use wait_event() when possible to avoid code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
If mounting with nodatasum option, we won't csum file data for
general write or direct-io write, and this rule should also be
applied when writing compressed files.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Memory areas [ptr, ptr+total_len] and [name, name+total_len]
may overlap, so it's wrong to use memcpy().
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
In __btrfs_free_extent we will print the leaf if we fail to find the extent we
wanted, but the problem is if we get an error we won't have a leaf so often this
leads to a NULL pointer dereference and we lose the error that actually
occurred. So only print the leaf if ret > 0, which means we didn't find the
item we were looking for but we didn't error either. This way the error is
preserved.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
This is fairly trivial - btrfs_set_root_node() - always returns zero so we
can just make it void. All callers ignore the return code now anyway. I
also made sure to check that none of the functions that
btrfs_set_root_node() calls returns an error that we might have needed to
catch and pass back.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Here I have a two SSD-partitions btrfs, and they are defaultly set to
"data=raid0, metadata=raid1", then I try to fill my btrfs partition
till "No space left on device", via "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/tmp".
I get an oops panic from kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5199!, which
refers to find_free_extent's
BUG_ON(index != get_block_group_index(block_group));
In SSD mode, in order to find enough space to alloc, we may check the
block_group cache which has been checked sometime before, but the index is not
updated, where it hits the BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The access for ro in btrfs_block_group_cache should be protected
because of the racy lock in relocation.
Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <wu.bo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The set/clear bit and the extent split/merge hooks only ever return 0.
Changing them to return void simplifies the error handling cases later.
This patch changes the hook prototypes, the single implementation of each,
and the functions that call them to return void instead.
Since all four of these hooks execute under a spinlock, they're necessarily
simple.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
We passed the wrong value to btrfs_force_ra(). Fix this by changing
the argument of btrfs_force_ra() from last_index to nr_page.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When btrfs_unlink_inode() and btrfs_orphan_add() in btrfs_unlink()
are error, the error code is returned to the caller instead of
BUG_ON().
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Don't need to check the return value of __btrfs_add_inode_defrag(),
since it will always return 0.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The btrfs transaction code will return any errors that come from
reserve_metadata_bytes. We need to make sure we don't return funny
things like 1 or EAGAIN.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Now that we are using regular file crcs for the free space cache,
we can deadlock if we try to read the free_space_inode while we are
updating the crc tree.
This commit fixes things by using the commit_root to read the crcs. This is
safe because we the free space cache file would already be loaded if
that block group had been changed in the current transaction.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
For metadata buffers that don't straddle pages (all of them), btrfs
can safely use the page uptodate bits and extent_buffer uptodate bit
instead of needing to use the extent_state tree.
This greatly reduces contention on the state tree lock.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Before the reader/writer locks, btrfs_next_leaf needed to keep
the path blocking to avoid making lockdep upset.
Now that btrfs_next_leaf only takes read locks, this isn't required.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
This patch was originally from Tejun Heo. lockdep complains about the btrfs
locking because we sometimes take btree locks from two different trees at the
same time. The current classes are based only on level in the btree, which
isn't enough information for lockdep to figure out if the lock is safe.
This patch makes a class for each type of tree, and lumps all the FS trees that
actually have files and directories into the same class.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The btrfs metadata btree is the source of significant
lock contention, especially in the root node. This
commit changes our locking to use a reader/writer
lock.
The lock is built on top of rw spinlocks, and it
extends the lock tracking to remember if we have a
read lock or a write lock when we go to blocking. Atomics
count the number of blocking readers or writers at any
given time.
It removes all of the adaptive spinning from the old code
and uses only the spinning/blocking hints inside of btrfs
to decide when it should continue spinning.
In read heavy workloads this is dramatically faster. In write
heavy workloads we're still faster because of less contention
on the root node lock.
We suffer slightly in dbench because we schedule more often
during write locks, but all other benchmarks so far are improved.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Hit this nice little deadlock. What happens is this
__btrfs_end_transaction with throttle set, --use_count so it equals 0
btrfs_commit_transaction
<somebody else actually manages to start the commit>
btrfs_end_transaction --use_count so now its -1 <== BAD
we just return and wait on the transaction
This is bad because we just return after our use_count is -1 and don't let go
of our num_writer count on the transaction, so the guy committing the
transaction just sits there forever. Fix this by inc'ing our use_count if we're
going to call commit_transaction so that if we call btrfs_end_transaction it's
valid. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
The extent_buffers have a very complex interface where
we use HIGHMEM for metadata and try to cache a kmap mapping
to access the memory.
The next commit adds reader/writer locks, and concurrent use
of this kmap cache would make it even more complex.
This commit drops the ability to use HIGHMEM with extent buffers,
and rips out all of the related code.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
When we balanced the chunks across the devices, BUG_ON() in
__finish_chunk_alloc() was triggered.
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2568!
[SNIP]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa049525e>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x8e/0xa0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04546b0>] do_chunk_alloc+0x330/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045c654>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb4/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045c86b>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xdb/0x350 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa048a8d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04476fd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x14d/0x5e0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa044660d>] ? read_block_for_search+0x14d/0x4d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0447c9b>] btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x240 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa044dd5e>] btrfs_search_slot+0x49e/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa044f07d>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x8d/0xf0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045e973>] insert_with_overflow+0x43/0x110 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045eb0d>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0xcd/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0489bd0>] ? map_extent_buffer+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff812276ad>] ? rb_insert_color+0x9d/0x160
[<ffffffffa046cc40>] ? inode_tree_add+0xf0/0x150 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0474801>] btrfs_add_link+0xc1/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811dacac>] ? security_inode_init_security+0x1c/0x30
[<ffffffffa04a28aa>] ? btrfs_init_acl+0x4a/0x180 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa047492f>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x2f/0x70 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa046af16>] ? btrfs_init_inode_security+0x46/0x60 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0474ac0>] btrfs_create+0x150/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81159c63>] ? generic_permission+0x23/0xb0
[<ffffffff8115b415>] vfs_create+0xa5/0xc0
[<ffffffff8115ce6e>] do_last+0x5fe/0x880
[<ffffffff8115dc0d>] path_openat+0xcd/0x3d0
[<ffffffff8115e029>] do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0
[<ffffffff8116a965>] ? alloc_fd+0x95/0x160
[<ffffffff8114f0c7>] do_sys_open+0x107/0x1e0
[<ffffffff810bcc3f>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1bf/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8114f1e0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff81484ec2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[SNIP]
RIP [<ffffffffa049444a>] __finish_chunk_alloc+0x20a/0x220 [btrfs]
The reason is:
Task1 Space balance task
do_chunk_alloc()
__finish_chunk_alloc()
update device info
in the chunk tree
alloc system metadata block
relocate system metadata block group
set system metadata block group
readonly, This block group is the
only one that can allocate space. So
there is no free space that can be
allocated now.
find no space and don't try
to alloc new chunk, and then
return ENOSPC
BUG_ON() in __finish_chunk_alloc()
was triggered.
Fix this bug by allocating a new system metadata chunk before relocating the
old one if we find there is no free space which can be allocated after setting
the old block group to be read-only.
Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Everybody else does this, we need to do it too. If we're syncing, we need to
tag the pages we're going to write for writeback so we don't end up writing the
same stuff over and over again if somebody is constantly redirtying our file.
This will keep us from having latencies with heavy sync workloads. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
So I had this brilliant idea to use atomic counters for outstanding and reserved
extents, but this turned out to be a bad idea. Consider this where we have 1
outstanding extent and 1 reserved extent
Reserver Releaser
atomic_dec(outstanding) now 0
atomic_read(outstanding)+1 get 1
atomic_read(reserved) get 1
don't actually reserve anything because
they are the same
atomic_cmpxchg(reserved, 1, 0)
atomic_inc(outstanding)
atomic_add(0, reserved)
free reserved space for 1 extent
Then the reserver now has no actual space reserved for it, and when it goes to
finish the ordered IO it won't have enough space to do it's allocation and you
get those lovely warnings.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Kill the check to see if we have 512mb of reserved space in delalloc and
shrink_delalloc if we do. This causes unexpected latencies and we have other
logic to see if we need to throttle. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
grab_cache_page will use mapping_gfp_mask(), which for all inodes is set to
GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE. So instead use find_or_create_page in all cases where we
need GFP_NOFS so we don't deadlock. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
A user reported a deadlock when copying a bunch of files. This is because they
were low on memory and kthreadd got hung up trying to migrate pages for an
allocation when starting the caching kthread. The page was locked by the person
starting the caching kthread. To fix this we just need to use the async thread
stuff so that the threads are already created and we don't have to worry about
deadlocks. Thanks,
Reported-by: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
In addition to properly handling allocation failure from btrfs_alloc_path, I
also fixed up the kzalloc error handling code immediately below it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
I also removed the BUG_ON from error return of find_next_chunk in
init_first_rw_device(). It turns out that the only caller of
init_first_rw_device() also BUGS on any nonzero return so no actual behavior
change has occurred here.
do_chunk_alloc() also needed an update since it calls btrfs_alloc_chunk()
which can now return -ENOMEM. Instead of setting space_info->full on any
error from btrfs_alloc_chunk() I catch and return every error value _except_
-ENOSPC. Thanks goes to Tsutomu Itoh for pointing that issue out.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
