4877c73728
In general the semantics of IPIs are that they are are expected to continue functioning after dpm_suspend_noirq(). Specifically I have seen a deadlock between the callfunc IPI and the stop machine used by xen's do_suspend() routine. If one CPU has already called dpm_suspend_noirq() then there is a window where it can be sent a callfunc IPI before all the other CPUs have entered stop_cpu(). If this happens then the first CPU ends up spinning in stop_cpu() waiting for the other to rendezvous in state STOPMACHINE_PREPARE while the other is spinning in csd_lock_wait(). Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com LKML-Reference: <1280398595-29708-4-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
xenbus | ||
xenfs | ||
balloon.c | ||
cpu_hotplug.c | ||
events.c | ||
evtchn.c | ||
features.c | ||
grant-table.c | ||
Kconfig | ||
Makefile | ||
manage.c | ||
sys-hypervisor.c | ||
xencomm.c |