c00bedb368
On 12/20/2011 11:20 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Allow SIGCHLD to be passed to child process without > explicit policy. This will help to keep the access > control policy simple and easily maintainable with > complex applications that require use of multiple > security contexts. It will also help to keep them > as isolated as possible. > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com> I have a slightly different version that applies to the current smack-next tree. Allow SIGCHLD to be passed to child process without explicit policy. This will help to keep the access control policy simple and easily maintainable with complex applications that require use of multiple security contexts. It will also help to keep them as isolated as possible. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 37 ++++++++----------------------------- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| apparmor | ||
| integrity | ||
| keys | ||
| selinux | ||
| smack | ||
| tomoyo | ||
| yama | ||
| capability.c | ||
| commoncap.c | ||
| device_cgroup.c | ||
| inode.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| lsm_audit.c | ||
| Makefile | ||
| min_addr.c | ||
| security.c | ||