pkgsrc/shells/mudsh/distinfo

$NetBSD: distinfo,v 1.2 2005/02/24 13:14:41 agc Exp $

SHA1 (mudsh) = 545f3a095cad25e0334df598a63ced3a1c3aeef1
RMD160 (mudsh) = 885133cbb847581e7ecc1f63eed4ab5ff3bf9d2d
Size (mudsh) = 21309 bytes
Add RMD160 digests. 2005-02-24 13:51:41 +01:00			$NetBSD: distinfo,v 1.2 2005/02/24 13:14:41 agc Exp $
Initial import of the MUD-Shell into the NetBSD packages collection as shells/mudsh. Is there any reason why a shell (or command line) cannot be as tolerant or as intelligent as a text adventure game like Zork, or a MUD (Multi User Dungeon)? Is there any reason why a shell cannot work like such a game? ("Go North", etc.) Actually, the answer is no and this is a perl implementation to prove it. Have fun, and don't get eaten by a Grue! 2002-11-18 18:10:17 +01:00
			`SHA1 (mudsh) = 545f3a095cad25e0334df598a63ced3a1c3aeef1`
Add RMD160 digests. 2005-02-24 13:51:41 +01:00			`RMD160 (mudsh) = 885133cbb847581e7ecc1f63eed4ab5ff3bf9d2d`
Initial import of the MUD-Shell into the NetBSD packages collection as shells/mudsh. Is there any reason why a shell (or command line) cannot be as tolerant or as intelligent as a text adventure game like Zork, or a MUD (Multi User Dungeon)? Is there any reason why a shell cannot work like such a game? ("Go North", etc.) Actually, the answer is no and this is a perl implementation to prove it. Have fun, and don't get eaten by a Grue! 2002-11-18 18:10:17 +01:00			`Size (mudsh) = 21309 bytes`