kpriv/pkgsrc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
pkgsrc/shells/mudsh/Makefile

28 lines
647 B
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

Point MAINTAINER to pkgsrc-users@NetBSD.org in the case where no developer is officially maintaining the package. The rationale for changing this from "tech-pkg" to "pkgsrc-users" is that it implies that any user can try to maintain the package (by submitting patches to the mailing list). Since the folks most likely to care about the package are the folks that want to use it or are already using it, this would leverage the energy of users who aren't developers.
2006-03-04 22:28:51 +01:00
# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.11 2006/03/04 21:30:39 jlam Exp $
Initial import of the MUD-Shell into the NetBSD packages collection as shells/mudsh. Is there any reason why a shell (or command line) cannot be as tolerant or as intelligent as a text adventure game like Zork, or a MUD (Multi User Dungeon)? Is there any reason why a shell cannot work like such a game? ("Go North", etc.) Actually, the answer is no and this is a perl implementation to prove it. Have fun, and don't get eaten by a Grue!
2002-11-18 18:10:17 +01:00
#
DISTNAME= mudsh
PKGNAME= mudsh-20010311
CATEGORIES= shells
MASTER_SITES= http://www.xirium.com/tech/mud-shell/download/
EXTRACT_SUFX= # empty
Point MAINTAINER to pkgsrc-users@NetBSD.org in the case where no developer is officially maintaining the package. The rationale for changing this from "tech-pkg" to "pkgsrc-users" is that it implies that any user can try to maintain the package (by submitting patches to the mailing list). Since the folks most likely to care about the package are the folks that want to use it or are already using it, this would leverage the energy of users who aren't developers.
2006-03-04 22:28:51 +01:00
MAINTAINER= pkgsrc-users@NetBSD.org
Initial import of the MUD-Shell into the NetBSD packages collection as shells/mudsh. Is there any reason why a shell (or command line) cannot be as tolerant or as intelligent as a text adventure game like Zork, or a MUD (Multi User Dungeon)? Is there any reason why a shell cannot work like such a game? ("Go North", etc.) Actually, the answer is no and this is a perl implementation to prove it. Have fun, and don't get eaten by a Grue!
2002-11-18 18:10:17 +01:00
HOMEPAGE= http://www.xirium.com/tech/mud-shell/index.html
COMMENT= M.U.D. game-like shell
Move WRKSRC definition away from the first paragraph in a Makefile.
2004-01-20 13:18:15 +01:00
WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}
Remove some unnecessarily strong dependencies on perl that resulted from including perl5/buildlink3.mk. These packages just need the Perl interpreter, and can just add "perl" to USE_TOOLS instead.
2005-07-16 21:10:37 +02:00
USE_TOOLS+= perl:run
Initial import of the MUD-Shell into the NetBSD packages collection as shells/mudsh. Is there any reason why a shell (or command line) cannot be as tolerant or as intelligent as a text adventure game like Zork, or a MUD (Multi User Dungeon)? Is there any reason why a shell cannot work like such a game? ("Go North", etc.) Actually, the answer is no and this is a perl implementation to prove it. Have fun, and don't get eaten by a Grue!
2002-11-18 18:10:17 +01:00
Create directories before installing files into them.
2005-06-17 05:50:19 +02:00
INSTALLATION_DIRS= bin
Initial import of the MUD-Shell into the NetBSD packages collection as shells/mudsh. Is there any reason why a shell (or command line) cannot be as tolerant or as intelligent as a text adventure game like Zork, or a MUD (Multi User Dungeon)? Is there any reason why a shell cannot work like such a game? ("Go North", etc.) Actually, the answer is no and this is a perl implementation to prove it. Have fun, and don't get eaten by a Grue!
2002-11-18 18:10:17 +01:00
do-build:
@${CP} ${WRKSRC}/mudsh ${WRKSRC}/mudsh.orig
@${SED} -e 's|/usr/local/bin/perl|${LOCALBASE}/bin/perl|g' \
${WRKSRC}/mudsh.orig >${WRKSRC}/mudsh
do-install:
${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/mudsh ${PREFIX}/bin
.include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk"
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink