pkgsrc/sysutils/bup/patches/patch-Makefile

16 lines
430 B
Text
Raw Normal View History

Update to 0.26: This release doesn't include anything as significant as the metadata support added in 0.25, but it has quite a few bug fixes and internal improvements, in addition to these notable changes: - When --meta is specified to the fuse command, instead of generic data, the originally saved mode, uid, git, atime, mtime, and ctime will be reported for the archive paths. - When --browser is specified to the web command, a browser window will be opened for the repository. - The -x/--xdev/--one-filesystem options now include the mountpoint itself in the traversal (matching rsyc, tar, etc.). - Empty lines in --exclude-rx-from files will be ignored. Previously they would cause all paths to be excluded. - The index and restore commands now support --exclude-rx-from. - Relative filesystem --excludes like "--exclude bar" should now work. Previously --excludes had to be absolute. - The drecurse command now supports --exclude-rx and --exclude-rx-from. - The --compress option should now work for remote repositories. - Streams saved via "bup split" will now show up as a single file named "data" at the top level of the VFS, instead of as a subtree (i.e. when examined via ftp, ls, and fuse). - The ls command now supports -n, -A, -F, --file-type, --numeric-ids, and detailed -l options. - The save dates are now taken from the corresponding git commit's author date, not the committer date. - The tornado server, required by the web command, is no longer included. See the README for installation instructions. Note that the metadata support is still somewhat immature. For example, we still need to add better support for cross-filesystem-type save/restore (which is too noisy), etc. Please give this release a try and let us know what's broken. If you're new to bup, start with the README (and then HACKING if you'd like to help further): https://github.com/bup/bup/blob/master/README.md https://github.com/bup/bup/blob/master/HACKING http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/rlb/bup.git;a=blob;f=README.md;hb=refs/heads/master http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/rlb/bup.git;a=blob;f=HACKING;hb=refs/heads/master And although I probably sound like a broken record -- while we expect bup to work fairly well, I still don't recommend it as your sole backup strategy. I'd still suggest a periodic tar/rsync/etc. backstop.
2014-09-06 23:29:45 +02:00
$NetBSD: patch-Makefile,v 1.6 2014/09/06 21:29:45 wiz Exp $
Initial import of bup-0.24b. bup is a program that backs things up. bup has a few advantages over other backup software: It uses a rolling checksum algorithm (similar to rsync) to split large files into chunks. The most useful result of this is you can backup huge virtual machine (VM) disk images, databases, and XML files incrementally, even though they're typically all in one huge file, and not use tons of disk space for multiple versions. It uses the packfile format from git (the open source version control system), so you can access the stored data even if you don't like bup's user interface. Unlike git, it writes packfiles directly (instead of having a separate garbage collection / repacking stage) so it's fast even with gratuitously huge amounts of data. bup's improved index formats also allow you to track far more filenames than git (millions) and keep track of far more objects (hundreds or thousands of gigabytes). Data is "automagically" shared between incremental backups without having to know which backup is based on which other one - even if the backups are made from two different computers that don't even know about each other. You just tell bup to back stuff up, and it saves only the minimum amount of data needed. You can back up directly to a remote bup server, without needing tons of temporary disk space on the computer being backed up. And if your backup is interrupted halfway through, the next run will pick up where you left off. And it's easy to set up a bup server: just install bup on any machine where you have ssh access. Bup can use "par2" redundancy to recover corrupted backups even if your disk has undetected bad sectors. Even when a backup is incremental, you don't have to worry about restoring the full backup, then each of the incrementals in turn; an incremental backup acts as if it's a full backup, it just takes less disk space. You can mount your bup repository as a FUSE filesystem and access the content that way, and even export it over Samba.
2011-05-16 15:52:56 +02:00
2013-12-31 12:03:12 +01:00
Pass PYTHON through to configure.
Initial import of bup-0.24b. bup is a program that backs things up. bup has a few advantages over other backup software: It uses a rolling checksum algorithm (similar to rsync) to split large files into chunks. The most useful result of this is you can backup huge virtual machine (VM) disk images, databases, and XML files incrementally, even though they're typically all in one huge file, and not use tons of disk space for multiple versions. It uses the packfile format from git (the open source version control system), so you can access the stored data even if you don't like bup's user interface. Unlike git, it writes packfiles directly (instead of having a separate garbage collection / repacking stage) so it's fast even with gratuitously huge amounts of data. bup's improved index formats also allow you to track far more filenames than git (millions) and keep track of far more objects (hundreds or thousands of gigabytes). Data is "automagically" shared between incremental backups without having to know which backup is based on which other one - even if the backups are made from two different computers that don't even know about each other. You just tell bup to back stuff up, and it saves only the minimum amount of data needed. You can back up directly to a remote bup server, without needing tons of temporary disk space on the computer being backed up. And if your backup is interrupted halfway through, the next run will pick up where you left off. And it's easy to set up a bup server: just install bup on any machine where you have ssh access. Bup can use "par2" redundancy to recover corrupted backups even if your disk has undetected bad sectors. Even when a backup is incremental, you don't have to worry about restoring the full backup, then each of the incrementals in turn; an incremental backup acts as if it's a full backup, it just takes less disk space. You can mount your bup repository as a FUSE filesystem and access the content that way, and even export it over Samba.
2011-05-16 15:52:56 +02:00
Update to 0.26: This release doesn't include anything as significant as the metadata support added in 0.25, but it has quite a few bug fixes and internal improvements, in addition to these notable changes: - When --meta is specified to the fuse command, instead of generic data, the originally saved mode, uid, git, atime, mtime, and ctime will be reported for the archive paths. - When --browser is specified to the web command, a browser window will be opened for the repository. - The -x/--xdev/--one-filesystem options now include the mountpoint itself in the traversal (matching rsyc, tar, etc.). - Empty lines in --exclude-rx-from files will be ignored. Previously they would cause all paths to be excluded. - The index and restore commands now support --exclude-rx-from. - Relative filesystem --excludes like "--exclude bar" should now work. Previously --excludes had to be absolute. - The drecurse command now supports --exclude-rx and --exclude-rx-from. - The --compress option should now work for remote repositories. - Streams saved via "bup split" will now show up as a single file named "data" at the top level of the VFS, instead of as a subtree (i.e. when examined via ftp, ls, and fuse). - The ls command now supports -n, -A, -F, --file-type, --numeric-ids, and detailed -l options. - The save dates are now taken from the corresponding git commit's author date, not the committer date. - The tornado server, required by the web command, is no longer included. See the README for installation instructions. Note that the metadata support is still somewhat immature. For example, we still need to add better support for cross-filesystem-type save/restore (which is too noisy), etc. Please give this release a try and let us know what's broken. If you're new to bup, start with the README (and then HACKING if you'd like to help further): https://github.com/bup/bup/blob/master/README.md https://github.com/bup/bup/blob/master/HACKING http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/rlb/bup.git;a=blob;f=README.md;hb=refs/heads/master http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/rlb/bup.git;a=blob;f=HACKING;hb=refs/heads/master And although I probably sound like a broken record -- while we expect bup to work fairly well, I still don't recommend it as your sole backup strategy. I'd still suggest a periodic tar/rsync/etc. backstop.
2014-09-06 23:29:45 +02:00
--- Makefile.orig 2013-12-20 09:43:15.000000000 +0000
Initial import of bup-0.24b. bup is a program that backs things up. bup has a few advantages over other backup software: It uses a rolling checksum algorithm (similar to rsync) to split large files into chunks. The most useful result of this is you can backup huge virtual machine (VM) disk images, databases, and XML files incrementally, even though they're typically all in one huge file, and not use tons of disk space for multiple versions. It uses the packfile format from git (the open source version control system), so you can access the stored data even if you don't like bup's user interface. Unlike git, it writes packfiles directly (instead of having a separate garbage collection / repacking stage) so it's fast even with gratuitously huge amounts of data. bup's improved index formats also allow you to track far more filenames than git (millions) and keep track of far more objects (hundreds or thousands of gigabytes). Data is "automagically" shared between incremental backups without having to know which backup is based on which other one - even if the backups are made from two different computers that don't even know about each other. You just tell bup to back stuff up, and it saves only the minimum amount of data needed. You can back up directly to a remote bup server, without needing tons of temporary disk space on the computer being backed up. And if your backup is interrupted halfway through, the next run will pick up where you left off. And it's easy to set up a bup server: just install bup on any machine where you have ssh access. Bup can use "par2" redundancy to recover corrupted backups even if your disk has undetected bad sectors. Even when a backup is incremental, you don't have to worry about restoring the full backup, then each of the incrementals in turn; an incremental backup acts as if it's a full backup, it just takes less disk space. You can mount your bup repository as a FUSE filesystem and access the content that way, and even export it over Samba.
2011-05-16 15:52:56 +02:00
+++ Makefile
2013-12-31 12:03:12 +01:00
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ install: all
Initial import of bup-0.24b. bup is a program that backs things up. bup has a few advantages over other backup software: It uses a rolling checksum algorithm (similar to rsync) to split large files into chunks. The most useful result of this is you can backup huge virtual machine (VM) disk images, databases, and XML files incrementally, even though they're typically all in one huge file, and not use tons of disk space for multiple versions. It uses the packfile format from git (the open source version control system), so you can access the stored data even if you don't like bup's user interface. Unlike git, it writes packfiles directly (instead of having a separate garbage collection / repacking stage) so it's fast even with gratuitously huge amounts of data. bup's improved index formats also allow you to track far more filenames than git (millions) and keep track of far more objects (hundreds or thousands of gigabytes). Data is "automagically" shared between incremental backups without having to know which backup is based on which other one - even if the backups are made from two different computers that don't even know about each other. You just tell bup to back stuff up, and it saves only the minimum amount of data needed. You can back up directly to a remote bup server, without needing tons of temporary disk space on the computer being backed up. And if your backup is interrupted halfway through, the next run will pick up where you left off. And it's easy to set up a bup server: just install bup on any machine where you have ssh access. Bup can use "par2" redundancy to recover corrupted backups even if your disk has undetected bad sectors. Even when a backup is incremental, you don't have to worry about restoring the full backup, then each of the incrementals in turn; an incremental backup acts as if it's a full backup, it just takes less disk space. You can mount your bup repository as a FUSE filesystem and access the content that way, and even export it over Samba.
2011-05-16 15:52:56 +02:00
2013-12-31 12:03:12 +01:00
config/config.h: config/Makefile config/configure config/configure.inc \
$(wildcard config/*.in)
- cd config && $(MAKE) config.h
+ cd config && $(MAKE) PYTHON=$(PYTHON) config.h
lib/bup/_helpers$(SOEXT): \
config/config.h \