kpriv/pkgsrc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Got rid of _PKG_SILENT. Why use __file__ when a simple f does the same?

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
rillig 2008-01-23 14:59:35 +00:00
parent 8c1132d309
commit 800789264a
1 changed files with 7 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
mk/extract/extract.mk
View file

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# $NetBSD: extract.mk,v 1.23 2007/12/30 13:37:18 joerg Exp $
# $NetBSD: extract.mk,v 1.24 2008/01/23 14:59:35 rillig Exp $
#
# The following variables may be set by the package Makefile and
# specify how extraction happens:
@ -103,8 +103,7 @@ extract-message:
.PHONY: extract-dir
extract-dir:
${_PKG_SILENT}${_PKG_DEBUG} \
mkdir -p ${EXTRACT_DIR}
${RUN}${MKDIR} ${EXTRACT_DIR}
######################################################################
### extract-check-interactive (PRIVATE)
@ -131,9 +130,9 @@ extract-check-interactive:
###
.PHONY: extract-cookie
extract-cookie:
${_PKG_SILENT}${_PKG_DEBUG}${TEST} ! -f ${_COOKIE.extract} || ${FALSE}
${_PKG_SILENT}${_PKG_DEBUG}${MKDIR} ${_COOKIE.extract:H}
${_PKG_SILENT}${_PKG_DEBUG}${ECHO} ${PKGNAME} > ${_COOKIE.extract}
${RUN}${TEST} ! -f ${_COOKIE.extract} || ${FALSE}
${RUN}${MKDIR} ${_COOKIE.extract:H}
${RUN}${ECHO} ${PKGNAME} > ${_COOKIE.extract}
######################################################################
### pre-extract, do-extract, post-extract (PUBLIC, override)
@ -201,9 +200,8 @@ DOWNLOADED_DISTFILE= $${extract_file}
.if !target(do-extract)
do-extract: ${WRKDIR}
. for __file__ in ${EXTRACT_ONLY}
${_PKG_SILENT}${_PKG_DEBUG} \
extract_file=${_DISTDIR:Q}/${__file__:Q}; export extract_file; \
. for f in ${EXTRACT_ONLY}
${RUN} extract_file=${_DISTDIR:Q}/${f:Q}; export extract_file; \
cd ${WRKDIR} && cd ${EXTRACT_DIR} && ${EXTRACT_CMD}
. endfor
.endif