kpriv/pkgsrc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Just because the (native) PAM package might already contain this is no

Browse source 
reason to not build a binary package.
This commit is contained in:
joerg 2014-06-10 13:45:16 +00:00
parent 5c3d410453
commit 90dae8e66c
1 changed files with 1 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
security/pam-mkhomedir/Makefile
View file

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.5 2012/10/23 18:16:48 asau Exp $
# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.6 2014/06/10 13:45:16 joerg Exp $
DISTNAME= pam-mkhomedir-1
CATEGORIES= security
@ -39,7 +39,4 @@ CFLAGS+= -DNO_STATIC_MODULES
.endif
.include "../../mk/pam.buildlink3.mk"
.if "${PAM_TYPE}" == "linux-pam"
PKG_FAIL_REASON+= "Disabled: The PAM mkhomedir module is included in the PAM package."
.endif
.include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk"