Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jlam
9c8b5ede43 Point MAINTAINER to pkgsrc-users@NetBSD.org in the case where no
developer is officially maintaining the package.

The rationale for changing this from "tech-pkg" to "pkgsrc-users" is
that it implies that any user can try to maintain the package (by
submitting patches to the mailing list).  Since the folks most likely
to care about the package are the folks that want to use it or are
already using it, this would leverage the energy of users who aren't
developers.
2006-03-04 21:28:51 +00:00
jlam
7fbb8d9527 Bump the PKGREVISIONs of all (638) packages that hardcode the locations
of Perl files to deal with the perl-5.8.7 update that moved all
pkgsrc-installed Perl files into the "vendor" directories.
2005-08-06 06:19:03 +00:00
jlam
7a6521287b Turn PERL5_PACKLIST into a relative path instead of an absolute path.
These paths are now relative to PERL5_PACKLIST_DIR, which currently
defaults to ${PERL5_SITEARCH}.  There is no change to the binary
packages.
2005-07-13 18:01:18 +00:00
tv
f816d81489 Remove USE_BUILDLINK3 and NO_BUILDLINK; these are no longer used. 2005-04-11 21:44:48 +00:00
agc
c71cac836a Add RMD160 digests to the SHA1 ones. 2005-02-24 14:48:39 +00:00
wiz
069dc6b84c Initial import of p5-XML-SAX-Writer-0.44:
A new XML Writer was needed to match the SAX2 effort because quite
naturally no existing writer understood SAX2. My first intention
had been to start patching XML::Handler::YAWriter as it had previously
been my favourite writer in the SAX1 world.

However the more I patched it the more I realised that what I
thought was going to be a simple patch (mostly adding a few event
handlers and changing the attribute syntax) was turning out to be
a rewrite due to various ideas I'd been collecting along the way.
Besides, I couldn't find a way to elegantly make it work with SAX2
without breaking the SAX1 compatibility which people are probably
still using. There are of course ways to do that, but most require
user interaction which is something I wanted to avoid.

So in the end there was a new writer. I think it's in fact better
this way as it helps keep SAX1 and SAX2 separated.
2005-02-19 19:21:58 +00:00