Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
wiz
d2ca14a3f1 Bump all packages for perl-5.18, that
a) refer 'perl' in their Makefile, or
b) have a directory name of p5-*, or
c) have any dependency on any p5-* package

Like last time, where this caused no complaints.
2013-05-31 12:39:57 +00:00
obache
00dea84d0b meta-pkgs/bulk-* are just for build test purpose:
* change dependeny on listed packages from full to build
* prevent to provide binary pakcage
2013-02-23 02:53:58 +00:00
dholland
522063d466 Update emacs depends. (oops) 2013-02-17 18:41:11 +00:00
dholland
9a451c7f41 Drop ruby-rails3 and ruby-rails31, which are going away. 2013-02-17 09:09:28 +00:00
dholland
62a2309dd7 woops, fix further scan lossage 2013-01-20 21:59:01 +00:00
dholland
1d469cc861 Fix more pbulk-scan problems. I ran it through pbulk-scan, but I must
have messed up, as all of what this commit changes was definitely wrong.
2013-01-19 09:12:52 +00:00
dholland
fe3d2496bf There are altogether too many packages whose PKGNAME and PKGDIR don't
match.

These now pbulk-scan properly.
2013-01-17 06:05:31 +00:00
dholland
dcf36891b8 Add three meta-packages, bulk-small, bulk-medium, and bulk-large.
These are lists of packages that can be used to do restricted bulk
builds on small/slow machines without having to spend time researching
which packages to include.

They are supposed to take roughly 1 hour, 8 hours, and 24 hours on the
arbitrarily chosen yardstick of my build machine; my hope is that this
translates into only moderately crazy lengths of time for slow
platforms where a full bulk build takes 6-8 months.

The lists will doubtless need some adjustment to meet this time
budget. Also, please take any discussion of which packages are and are
not included to tech-pkg or pkgsrc-users. The intent is to provide a
maximally useful set of a given size, but that's naturally difficult
to define.
2013-01-17 03:51:05 +00:00